PairBook
HomeGBTG › GBTG vs MCK

GBTG vs MCK: Correlation

Measured on weekly returns over the past three years, Global Business Travel Group, Inc. (GBTG) and McKesson Corporation (MCK) carry a correlation of -0.25, a negative link.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
-0.25
negative
Correlation (1Y)
-0.42
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
-0.12
long-run
Ann. covariance
-317.3
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are GBTG and MCK?

On 3 years of weekly data the GBTG/MCK correlation comes out at -0.25, negative, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. The link has loosened recently: the 1-year correlation (-0.42) runs below the 3-year figure (-0.25). The 5-year figure is -0.12, and annualized covariance runs at -317.3 %².

MCK is close to the least connected end of GBTG's tracked universe, ranking #24 of 27. Correlation aside, the last 12 months split them widely, with MCK ahead by 16.0 points (+14.8% versus +30.8%). Note the risk asymmetry: GBTG runs 2.0 times the annualized volatility of the other leg, so equal-weighting the two is not an equal-risk position.

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

GBTG vs MCK: side by side

GBTG (Global Business Travel Group, Inc.)MCK (McKesson Corporation)
1-year return+14.8%+30.8%
5-year returnn/a+354.8%
Volatility (ann.)50.5%25.1%
Beta vs S&P 5001.390.16
Max drawdown (3Y)-48.0%-27.2%
Market cap$4.9B$103.8B
P/E (trailing)59.124.0
Dividend yield0.00%0.37%
Sector / categoryUS ListedHealth Care
Lower P/E: MCK 24.0 vs 59.1Higher yield: MCK 0.37% vs 0.00%Smaller drawdown: MCK -27.2% vs -48.0%
-38%0%+44%2025-09-052026-08-27
Twelve months of weekly closes, each series rebased to 100. GBTG · MCK

Year-by-year returns

YearGBTGMCK
2022+51.8%
2023-4.4%+24.1%
2024+43.9%+23.7%
2025-17.6%+44.5%
2026+23.7%+8.8%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are GBTG and MCK good diversifiers for each other?

By historical standards, yes. A correlation of -0.25 means the two rarely move for the same reasons.

FAQ

What is the correlation between GBTG and MCK?

As of 2026-08-27, the correlation of weekly returns between GBTG and MCK is -0.25 over 3 years, -0.42 over 1 year and -0.12 over 5 years.

Is MCK a good diversifier for GBTG?

By historical standards, yes. A correlation of -0.25 means the two rarely move for the same reasons.

What does a correlation of -0.25 mean?

Correlation ranges from −1 to +1. Values near +1 mean two assets move together, near 0 that they move independently, and negative values that they tend to move in opposite directions. It measures co-movement, not performance.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/gbtg-vs-mck.json

GBTG vs MCK: 3-year weekly correlation -0.25GBTG vs MCK-0.25

Markdown for the live badge, attribution link included:

[![GBTG vs MCK correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/gbtg-vs-mck.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/gbtg-vs-mck/)

No key needed, free to use. Full endpoint list in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: GBTG correlations · MCK correlations