PairBook
HomeGBFH › GBFH vs MVIS

GBFH vs MVIS: Correlation

How closely do GBank Financial Holdings Inc. (GBFH) and MicroVision, Inc. (MVIS) trade together? Their weekly returns over three years give a correlation of -0.45, which is negative.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
-0.45
negative
Correlation (1Y)
-0.67
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
n/a
long-run
Ann. covariance
-23004.5
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are GBFH and MVIS?

Over the past 3 years, GBFH and MVIS moved with a correlation of -0.45, which is negative, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. Lately the two have drifted apart, with the 1-year correlation at -0.67 versus -0.45 over 3 years. Over 5 years the correlation is n/a, and the annualized covariance of weekly returns is -23004.5 %².

Out of 18 assets tracked against GBFH, MVIS lands near the bottom at #18. Correlation aside, the last 12 months split them widely, with MVIS ahead by 118.4 points (-50.5% versus +67.9%). One caveat on sizing: MVIS is 17.9 times as volatile as the other leg, so an equal-dollar split is far from equal-risk.

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

GBFH vs MVIS: side by side

GBFH (GBank Financial Holdings Inc.)MVIS (MicroVision, Inc.)
1-year return-50.5%+67.9%
5-year returnn/a-87.1%
Volatility (ann.)49.3%882.4%
Beta vs S&P 5001.113.46
Max drawdown (3Y)-53.8%-95.3%
Market cap$0.3B$0.1B
P/E (trailing)15.9
Dividend yield0.00%0.00%
Sector / categoryUS ListedUS Listed
Smaller drawdown: GBFH -53.8% vs -95.3%
-78%0%+265%2025-09-052026-08-27
Twelve months of weekly closes, each series rebased to 100. GBFH · MVIS

Year-by-year returns

YearGBFHMVIS
2022-53.1%
2023+13.2%
2024-50.8%
2025-21.2%-36.6%
2026-40.0%+126.5%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are GBFH and MVIS good diversifiers for each other?

Yes: at -0.45, the two have gone their own ways historically, which is what genuine diversification looks like.

FAQ

What is the correlation between GBFH and MVIS?

Using weekly returns as of 2026-08-27: -0.45 over 3 years, with -0.67 over the last year and n/a over 5 years.

Is MVIS a good diversifier for GBFH?

Yes: at -0.45, the two have gone their own ways historically, which is what genuine diversification looks like.

What does a correlation of -0.45 mean?

Correlation ranges from −1 to +1. Values near +1 mean two assets move together, near 0 that they move independently, and negative values that they tend to move in opposite directions. It measures co-movement, not performance.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/gbfh-vs-mvis.json

GBFH vs MVIS: 3-year weekly correlation -0.45GBFH vs MVIS-0.45

Drop this badge in a README or notebook; it updates with the data:

[![GBFH vs MVIS correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/gbfh-vs-mvis.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/gbfh-vs-mvis/)

No key needed, free to use. Full endpoint list in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: GBFH correlations · MVIS correlations