PairBook
HomeGBFH › GBFH vs GRN

GBFH vs GRN: Correlation

GBank Financial Holdings Inc. (GBFH) and iPath Series B Carbon Exchange-Traded Notes (GRN) show a moderate relationship: their 3-year correlation of weekly returns is 0.34.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
0.34
moderate
Correlation (1Y)
0.23
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
n/a
long-run
Ann. covariance
410.2
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are GBFH and GRN?

Over the past 3 years, GBFH and GRN moved with a correlation of 0.34, which is moderate. The past 12 months show a weaker link (0.23) than the 3-year average (0.34). Over 5 years the correlation is n/a, and the annualized covariance of weekly returns is 410.2 %².

Within GBFH's tracked universe of 18 assets, GRN comes in at #8 by 3-year correlation. Correlation aside, the last 12 months split them widely, with GRN ahead by 65.2 points (-50.5% versus +14.7%). Note the risk asymmetry: GBFH runs 1.7 times the annualized volatility of the other leg, so equal-weighting the two is not an equal-risk position.

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

GBFH vs GRN: side by side

GBFH (GBank Financial Holdings Inc.)GRN (iPath Series B Carbon Exchange-Traded Notes)
1-year return-50.5%+14.7%
5-year returnn/a+36.8%
Volatility (ann.)49.3%29.5%
Beta vs S&P 5001.110.40
Max drawdown (3Y)-53.8%-40.7%
Market cap$0.3B
P/E (trailing)15.93.5
Dividend yield0.00%0.00%
Sector / categoryUS ListedUS Listed
Lower P/E: GRN 3.5 vs 15.9Smaller drawdown: GRN -40.7% vs -53.8%
-48%0%+19%2025-09-052026-08-27
Twelve months of weekly closes, each series rebased to 100. GBFH · GRN

Year-by-year returns

YearGBFHGRN
2022-0.1%
2023-3.0%
2024-7.3%
2025-21.2%+20.3%
2026-40.0%-3.8%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are GBFH and GRN good diversifiers for each other?

Reasonably. At 0.34, GBFH and GRN keep a meaningful degree of independence, and combining them has historically reduced portfolio volatility.

FAQ

What is the correlation between GBFH and GRN?

As of 2026-08-27, the correlation of weekly returns between GBFH and GRN is 0.34 over 3 years, 0.23 over 1 year and n/a over 5 years.

Is GRN a good diversifier for GBFH?

Reasonably. At 0.34, GBFH and GRN keep a meaningful degree of independence, and combining them has historically reduced portfolio volatility.

What does a correlation of 0.34 mean?

A reading of 0.34 sits on a scale from −1 (opposite moves) through 0 (unrelated) to +1 (identical moves). Correlation captures direction, not magnitude or performance.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/gbfh-vs-grn.json

GBFH vs GRN: 3-year weekly correlation 0.34GBFH vs GRN0.34

Markdown for the live badge, attribution link included:

[![GBFH vs GRN correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/gbfh-vs-grn.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/gbfh-vs-grn/)

No key needed, free to use. Full endpoint list in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: GBFH correlations · GRN correlations