PairBook
HomeGAME › GAME vs IESC

GAME vs IESC: Correlation

Measured on weekly returns over the past three years, GameSquare Holdings, Inc. (GAME) and IES Holdings, Inc. (IESC) carry a correlation of -0.40, a negative link.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
-0.40
negative
Correlation (1Y)
-0.65
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
-0.36
long-run
Ann. covariance
-10844.6
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are GAME and IESC?

Across a 3-year window, the weekly returns of GAME and IESC correlate at -0.40, negative, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. The past 12 months show a weaker link (-0.65) than the 3-year average (-0.40). Stretching to 5 years gives -0.36, with an annualized covariance of -10844.6 %².

IESC is close to the least connected end of GAME's tracked universe, ranking #10 of 10. The last year tells two different stories: GAME led by 313.3 percentage points, +307.1% for GAME against -6.2% for IESC. One caveat on sizing: GAME is 5.8 times as volatile as the other leg, so an equal-dollar split is far from equal-risk.

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

GAME vs IESC: side by side

GAME (GameSquare Holdings, Inc.)IESC (IES Holdings, Inc.)
1-year return+307.1%-6.2%
5-year return-88.4%+580.8%
Volatility (ann.)398.8%68.3%
Beta vs S&P 5001.641.67
Max drawdown (3Y)-90.7%-60.5%
Market cap$13.3B
P/E (trailing)29.5
Dividend yield0.00%0.00%
Sector / categoryUS ListedUS Listed
Smaller drawdown: IESC -60.5% vs -90.7%Higher 5y return: IESC +580.8% vs -88.4%
-65%0%+363%2025-09-052026-08-27
Price paths over the last 12 months, both indexed to 100 at the start (weekly closes). GAME · IESC

Year-by-year returns

YearGAMEIESC
2022-67.8%-29.8%
2023-53.8%+122.7%
2024-54.4%+153.7%
2025-53.3%+93.6%
2026+736.4%-14.2%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are GAME and IESC good diversifiers for each other?

Yes: at -0.40, the two have gone their own ways historically, which is what genuine diversification looks like.

FAQ

What is the correlation between GAME and IESC?

As of 2026-08-27, the correlation of weekly returns between GAME and IESC is -0.40 over 3 years, -0.65 over 1 year and -0.36 over 5 years.

Is IESC a good diversifier for GAME?

Yes: at -0.40, the two have gone their own ways historically, which is what genuine diversification looks like.

What does a correlation of -0.40 mean?

A reading of -0.40 sits on a scale from −1 (opposite moves) through 0 (unrelated) to +1 (identical moves). Correlation captures direction, not magnitude or performance.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/game-vs-iesc.json

GAME vs IESC: 3-year weekly correlation -0.40GAME vs IESC-0.40

Markdown for the live badge, attribution link included:

[![GAME vs IESC correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/game-vs-iesc.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/game-vs-iesc/)

Free with attribution; caching and terms are described in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: GAME correlations · IESC correlations