PairBook
HomeFUSB › FUSB vs SHFS

FUSB vs SHFS: Correlation

First US Bancshares, Inc. (FUSB) and SHF Holdings, Inc. (SHFS) show a negative relationship: their 3-year correlation of weekly returns is -0.18.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
-0.18
negative
Correlation (1Y)
-0.42
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
-0.05
long-run
Ann. covariance
-695.3
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are FUSB and SHFS?

On 3 years of weekly data the FUSB/SHFS correlation comes out at -0.18, negative, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. Lately the two have drifted apart, with the 1-year correlation at -0.42 versus -0.18 over 3 years. The 5-year figure is -0.05, and annualized covariance runs at -695.3 %².

By 3-year correlation, SHFS places #9 of the 16 assets tracked against FUSB. Their recent paths diverged sharply: over the last 12 months FUSB outperformed by 147.2 percentage points (+54.3% for FUSB against -92.9% for SHFS). One caveat on sizing: SHFS is 5.8 times as volatile as the other leg, so an equal-dollar split is far from equal-risk.

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

FUSB vs SHFS: side by side

FUSB (First US Bancshares, Inc.)SHFS (SHF Holdings, Inc.)
1-year return+54.3%-92.9%
5-year return+66.8%-99.9%
Volatility (ann.)26.1%150.8%
Beta vs S&P 5000.211.27
Max drawdown (3Y)-23.2%-99.4%
Market cap$0.1B
P/E (trailing)12.4
Dividend yield1.70%0.00%
Sector / categoryUS ListedUS Listed
Higher yield: FUSB 1.70% vs 0.00%Smaller drawdown: FUSB -23.2% vs -99.4%Higher 5y return: FUSB +66.8% vs -99.9%
-96%0%+62%2025-09-052026-08-27
Both assets over the last year, indexed to 100 at the starting week. FUSB · SHFS

Year-by-year returns

YearFUSBSHFS
2022-16.7%-82.4%
2023+21.6%-20.0%
2024+24.5%-68.3%
2025+13.4%-88.2%
2026+18.1%-84.9%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are FUSB and SHFS good diversifiers for each other?

Yes. With a correlation of -0.18, FUSB and SHFS have moved largely independently, which makes them a genuinely diversifying pair by historical standards.

FAQ

What is the correlation between FUSB and SHFS?

As of 2026-08-27, the correlation of weekly returns between FUSB and SHFS is -0.18 over 3 years, -0.42 over 1 year and -0.05 over 5 years.

Is SHFS a good diversifier for FUSB?

Yes. With a correlation of -0.18, FUSB and SHFS have moved largely independently, which makes them a genuinely diversifying pair by historical standards.

What does a correlation of -0.18 mean?

A reading of -0.18 sits on a scale from −1 (opposite moves) through 0 (unrelated) to +1 (identical moves). Correlation captures direction, not magnitude or performance.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/fusb-vs-shfs.json

FUSB vs SHFS: 3-year weekly correlation -0.18FUSB vs SHFS-0.18

Embed this badge (it refreshes with the data), with attribution:

[![FUSB vs SHFS correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/fusb-vs-shfs.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/fusb-vs-shfs/)

No key needed, free to use. Full endpoint list in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: FUSB correlations · SHFS correlations