PairBook
HomeFUN › FUN vs RMT

FUN vs RMT: Correlation

How closely do Six Flags Entertainment Corporation (FUN) and Royce Micro-Cap Trust, Inc. (RMT) trade together? Their weekly returns over three years give a correlation of 0.44, which is moderate.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
0.44
moderate
Correlation (1Y)
0.55
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
0.40
long-run
Ann. covariance
444.8
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are FUN and RMT?

Across a 3-year window, the weekly returns of FUN and RMT correlate at 0.44, moderate. Lately the two have moved closer together, with the 1-year correlation at 0.55 versus 0.44 over 3 years. Stretching to 5 years gives 0.40, with an annualized covariance of 444.8 %².

Among the 12 assets we track against FUN, RMT ranks #5 by 3-year correlation. The last year tells two different stories: RMT led by 81.1 percentage points, -32.7% for FUN against +48.4% for RMT. One caveat on sizing: FUN is 2.4 times as volatile as the other leg, so an equal-dollar split is far from equal-risk.

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

FUN vs RMT: side by side

FUN (Six Flags Entertainment Corporation)RMT (Royce Micro-Cap Trust, Inc.)
1-year return-32.7%+48.4%
5-year return-61.4%+80.1%
Volatility (ann.)49.2%20.5%
Beta vs S&P 5001.351.09
Max drawdown (3Y)-77.7%-26.4%
Market cap$1.6B$0.8B
P/E (trailing)8.5
Dividend yield0.00%5.57%
Sector / categoryUS ListedUS Listed
Higher yield: RMT 5.57% vs 0.00%Smaller drawdown: RMT -26.4% vs -77.7%Higher 5y return: RMT +80.1% vs -61.4%
-46%0%+52%2025-09-052026-08-27
Twelve months of weekly closes, each series rebased to 100. FUN · RMT

Year-by-year returns

YearFUNRMT
2022-16.2%-16.8%
2023-1.0%+15.8%
2024+22.8%+14.0%
2025-68.2%+16.1%
2026+4.0%+39.6%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are FUN and RMT good diversifiers for each other?

Reasonably. At 0.44, FUN and RMT keep a meaningful degree of independence, and combining them has historically reduced portfolio volatility.

FAQ

What is the correlation between FUN and RMT?

The FUN/RMT correlation stands at 0.44 on a 3-year window (1 year: 0.55, 5 years: 0.40), computed from weekly returns as of 2026-08-27.

Is RMT a good diversifier for FUN?

Reasonably. At 0.44, FUN and RMT keep a meaningful degree of independence, and combining them has historically reduced portfolio volatility.

What does a correlation of 0.44 mean?

Correlation ranges from −1 to +1. Values near +1 mean two assets move together, near 0 that they move independently, and negative values that they tend to move in opposite directions. It measures co-movement, not performance.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/fun-vs-rmt.json

FUN vs RMT: 3-year weekly correlation 0.44FUN vs RMT0.44

Markdown for the live badge, attribution link included:

[![FUN vs RMT correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/fun-vs-rmt.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/fun-vs-rmt/)

Free with attribution; caching and terms are described in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: FUN correlations · RMT correlations