PairBook
HomeFULC › FULC vs STI

FULC vs STI: Correlation

Measured on weekly returns over the past three years, Fulcrum Therapeutics, Inc. (FULC) and Solidion Technology, Inc. (STI) carry a correlation of -0.25, a negative link.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
-0.25
negative
Correlation (1Y)
-0.44
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
-0.19
long-run
Ann. covariance
-10638.1
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are FULC and STI?

Across a 3-year window, the weekly returns of FULC and STI correlate at -0.25, negative, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. The past 12 months show a weaker link (-0.44) than the 3-year average (-0.25). Stretching to 5 years gives -0.19, with an annualized covariance of -10638.1 %².

STI is close to the least connected end of FULC's tracked universe, ranking #9 of 11. Correlation aside, the last 12 months split them widely, with STI ahead by 187.3 points (-41.9% versus +145.4%). Risk is not evenly split, since STI carries 4.9 times the volatility of the other side.

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

FULC vs STI: side by side

FULC (Fulcrum Therapeutics, Inc.)STI (Solidion Technology, Inc.)
1-year return-41.9%+145.4%
5-year return-86.0%-98.5%
Volatility (ann.)92.9%458.4%
Beta vs S&P 5001.49-1.02
Max drawdown (3Y)-79.1%-99.5%
Market cap$0.3B$0.1B
P/E (trailing)
Dividend yield0.00%0.00%
Sector / categoryUS ListedUS Listed
Smaller drawdown: FULC -79.1% vs -99.5%Higher 5y return: FULC -86.0% vs -98.5%
-55%0%+503%2025-09-052026-08-27
Price paths over the last 12 months, both indexed to 100 at the start (weekly closes). FULC · STI

Year-by-year returns

YearFULCSTI
2022-58.8%
2023-7.3%-24.1%
2024-30.4%-90.9%
2025+140.6%-79.7%
2026-66.0%+9.0%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are FULC and STI good diversifiers for each other?

Yes. With a correlation of -0.25, FULC and STI have moved largely independently, which makes them a genuinely diversifying pair by historical standards.

FAQ

What is the correlation between FULC and STI?

As of 2026-08-27, the correlation of weekly returns between FULC and STI is -0.25 over 3 years, -0.44 over 1 year and -0.19 over 5 years.

Is STI a good diversifier for FULC?

Yes. With a correlation of -0.25, FULC and STI have moved largely independently, which makes them a genuinely diversifying pair by historical standards.

What does a correlation of -0.25 mean?

A reading of -0.25 sits on a scale from −1 (opposite moves) through 0 (unrelated) to +1 (identical moves). Correlation captures direction, not magnitude or performance.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/fulc-vs-sti.json

FULC vs STI: 3-year weekly correlation -0.25FULC vs STI-0.25

Markdown for the live badge, attribution link included:

[![FULC vs STI correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/fulc-vs-sti.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/fulc-vs-sti/)

No key needed, free to use. Full endpoint list in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: FULC correlations · STI correlations