PairBook
HomeFTHM › FTHM vs KR

FTHM vs KR: Correlation

Measured on weekly returns over the past three years, Fathom Holdings Inc. (FTHM) and Kroger (KR) carry a correlation of -0.34, a negative link.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
-0.34
negative
Correlation (1Y)
-0.45
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
-0.17
long-run
Ann. covariance
-1037.4
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are FTHM and KR?

Over the past 3 years, FTHM and KR moved with a correlation of -0.34, which is negative, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. The link has loosened recently: the 1-year correlation (-0.45) runs below the 3-year figure (-0.34). Over 5 years the correlation is -0.17, and the annualized covariance of weekly returns is -1037.4 %².

Among the 16 assets we track against FTHM, KR sits near the bottom by co-movement, at rank #16. The last year tells two different stories: KR led by 46.9 percentage points, -61.3% for FTHM against -14.4% for KR. One caveat on sizing: FTHM is 5.6 times as volatile as the other leg, so an equal-dollar split is far from equal-risk.

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

FTHM vs KR: side by side

FTHM (Fathom Holdings Inc.)KR (Kroger)
1-year return-61.3%-14.4%
5-year return-97.7%+37.3%
Volatility (ann.)130.4%23.4%
Beta vs S&P 5002.16-0.16
Max drawdown (3Y)-93.5%-26.2%
Market cap
P/E (trailing)33.3
Dividend yield0.00%1.79%
Sector / categoryUS ListedConsumer Staples
Higher yield: KR 1.79% vs 0.00%Smaller drawdown: KR -26.2% vs -93.5%Higher 5y return: KR +37.3% vs -97.7%
-79%0%+43%2025-09-052026-08-27
Twelve months of weekly closes, each series rebased to 100. FTHM · KR

Year-by-year returns

YearFTHMKR
2022-79.2%+0.4%
2023-15.5%+5.0%
2024-57.4%+36.9%
2025-34.0%+4.3%
2026-34.0%-7.3%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are FTHM and KR good diversifiers for each other?

Yes. With a correlation of -0.34, FTHM and KR have moved largely independently, which makes them a genuinely diversifying pair by historical standards.

FAQ

What is the correlation between FTHM and KR?

The FTHM/KR correlation stands at -0.34 on a 3-year window (1 year: -0.45, 5 years: -0.17), computed from weekly returns as of 2026-08-27.

Is KR a good diversifier for FTHM?

Yes. With a correlation of -0.34, FTHM and KR have moved largely independently, which makes them a genuinely diversifying pair by historical standards.

What does a correlation of -0.34 mean?

A reading of -0.34 sits on a scale from −1 (opposite moves) through 0 (unrelated) to +1 (identical moves). Correlation captures direction, not magnitude or performance.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/fthm-vs-kr.json

FTHM vs KR: 3-year weekly correlation -0.34FTHM vs KR-0.34

Embed this badge (it refreshes with the data), with attribution:

[![FTHM vs KR correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/fthm-vs-kr.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/fthm-vs-kr/)

The core API is free. Terms and every endpoint in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: FTHM correlations · KR correlations