PairBook
HomeFTH › FTH vs MDLZ

FTH vs MDLZ: Correlation

Faeth Therapeutics, Inc. (FTH) and Mondelez International (MDLZ) show a negative relationship: their 3-year correlation of weekly returns is -0.22.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
-0.22
negative
Correlation (1Y)
-0.41
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
-0.14
long-run
Ann. covariance
-839.0
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are FTH and MDLZ?

Over the past 3 years, FTH and MDLZ moved with a correlation of -0.22, which is negative, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. The link has loosened recently: the 1-year correlation (-0.41) runs below the 3-year figure (-0.22). Over 5 years the correlation is -0.14, and the annualized covariance of weekly returns is -839.0 %².

Within FTH's tracked universe of 19 assets, MDLZ comes in at #13 by 3-year correlation. The last year tells two different stories: FTH led by 316.1 percentage points, +320.7% for FTH against +4.6% for MDLZ. One caveat on sizing: FTH is 9.2 times as volatile as the other leg, so an equal-dollar split is far from equal-risk.

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

FTH vs MDLZ: side by side

FTH (Faeth Therapeutics, Inc.)MDLZ (Mondelez International)
1-year return+320.7%+4.6%
5-year return-83.6%+14.7%
Volatility (ann.)189.5%20.5%
Beta vs S&P 5001.770.03
Max drawdown (3Y)-84.3%-29.0%
Market cap$0.9B$79.7B
P/E (trailing)22.9
Dividend yield0.00%3.17%
Sector / categoryUS ListedConsumer Staples
Higher yield: MDLZ 3.17% vs 0.00%Smaller drawdown: MDLZ -29.0% vs -84.3%Higher 5y return: MDLZ +14.7% vs -83.6%
-12%0%+335%2025-09-052026-08-27
Price paths over the last 12 months, both indexed to 100 at the start (weekly closes). FTH · MDLZ

Year-by-year returns

YearFTHMDLZ
2022-74.3%+2.9%
2023-53.6%+11.2%
2024-29.2%-15.3%
2025+8.9%-7.0%
2026+216.2%+18.0%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are FTH and MDLZ good diversifiers for each other?

By historical standards, yes. A correlation of -0.22 means the two rarely move for the same reasons.

FAQ

What is the correlation between FTH and MDLZ?

As of 2026-08-27, the correlation of weekly returns between FTH and MDLZ is -0.22 over 3 years, -0.41 over 1 year and -0.14 over 5 years.

Is MDLZ a good diversifier for FTH?

By historical standards, yes. A correlation of -0.22 means the two rarely move for the same reasons.

What does a correlation of -0.22 mean?

A reading of -0.22 sits on a scale from −1 (opposite moves) through 0 (unrelated) to +1 (identical moves). Correlation captures direction, not magnitude or performance.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/fth-vs-mdlz.json

FTH vs MDLZ: 3-year weekly correlation -0.22FTH vs MDLZ-0.22

Embed this badge (it refreshes with the data), with attribution:

[![FTH vs MDLZ correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/fth-vs-mdlz.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/fth-vs-mdlz/)

The core API is free. Terms and every endpoint in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: FTH correlations · MDLZ correlations