PairBook
HomeFTCI › FTCI vs RSG

FTCI vs RSG: Correlation

Measured on weekly returns over the past three years, FTC Solar, Inc. (FTCI) and Republic Services (RSG) carry a correlation of -0.21, a negative link.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
-0.21
negative
Correlation (1Y)
-0.27
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
-0.05
long-run
Ann. covariance
-426.8
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are FTCI and RSG?

Across a 3-year window, the weekly returns of FTCI and RSG correlate at -0.21, negative, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. The relationship has been stable: the 1-year correlation (-0.27) sits close to the 3-year figure. Stretching to 5 years gives -0.05, with an annualized covariance of -426.8 %².

Among the 12 assets we track against FTCI, RSG sits near the bottom by co-movement, at rank #10. The last year tells two different stories: RSG led by 56.8 percentage points, -62.4% for FTCI against -5.6% for RSG. One caveat on sizing: FTCI is 7.6 times as volatile as the other leg, so an equal-dollar split is far from equal-risk.

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

FTCI vs RSG: side by side

FTCI (FTC Solar, Inc.)RSG (Republic Services)
1-year return-62.4%-5.6%
5-year return-97.8%+87.9%
Volatility (ann.)122.6%16.2%
Beta vs S&P 5002.610.17
Max drawdown (3Y)-90.4%-22.5%
Market cap$67.1B
P/E (trailing)31.0
Dividend yield0.00%1.13%
Sector / categoryUS ListedIndustrials
Higher yield: RSG 1.13% vs 0.00%Smaller drawdown: RSG -22.5% vs -90.4%Higher 5y return: RSG +87.9% vs -97.8%
-66%0%+96%2025-09-052026-08-27
Twelve months of weekly closes, each series rebased to 100. FTCI · RSG

Year-by-year returns

YearFTCIRSG
2022-64.6%-6.2%
2023-74.1%+29.6%
2024-20.5%+23.0%
2025+98.0%+6.4%
2026-77.7%+4.4%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are FTCI and RSG good diversifiers for each other?

Yes: at -0.21, the two have gone their own ways historically, which is what genuine diversification looks like.

FAQ

What is the correlation between FTCI and RSG?

Using weekly returns as of 2026-08-27: -0.21 over 3 years, with -0.27 over the last year and -0.05 over 5 years.

Is RSG a good diversifier for FTCI?

Yes: at -0.21, the two have gone their own ways historically, which is what genuine diversification looks like.

What does a correlation of -0.21 mean?

A reading of -0.21 sits on a scale from −1 (opposite moves) through 0 (unrelated) to +1 (identical moves). Correlation captures direction, not magnitude or performance.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/ftci-vs-rsg.json

FTCI vs RSG: 3-year weekly correlation -0.21FTCI vs RSG-0.21

Markdown for the live badge, attribution link included:

[![FTCI vs RSG correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/ftci-vs-rsg.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/ftci-vs-rsg/)

Free with attribution; caching and terms are described in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: FTCI correlations · RSG correlations