PairBook
HomeFSEA › FSEA vs VITL

FSEA vs VITL: Correlation

How closely do First Seacoast Bancorp, Inc. (FSEA) and Vital Farms, Inc. (VITL) trade together? Their weekly returns over three years give a correlation of -0.27, which is negative.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
-0.27
negative
Correlation (1Y)
-0.46
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
-0.18
long-run
Ann. covariance
-511.8
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are FSEA and VITL?

Across a 3-year window, the weekly returns of FSEA and VITL correlate at -0.27, negative, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. The link has loosened recently: the 1-year correlation (-0.46) runs below the 3-year figure (-0.27). Stretching to 5 years gives -0.18, with an annualized covariance of -511.8 %².

Among the 47 assets we track against FSEA, VITL ranks #31 by 3-year correlation. The last year tells two different stories: FSEA led by 129.0 percentage points, +48.9% for FSEA against -80.1% for VITL. One caveat on sizing: VITL is 1.7 times as volatile as the other leg, so an equal-dollar split is far from equal-risk.

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

FSEA vs VITL: side by side

FSEA (First Seacoast Bancorp, Inc.)VITL (Vital Farms, Inc.)
1-year return+48.9%-80.1%
5-year return+44.2%-39.5%
Volatility (ann.)33.2%57.5%
Beta vs S&P 5000.190.55
Max drawdown (3Y)-21.5%-84.2%
Market cap$0.1B$0.4B
P/E (trailing)
Dividend yield0.00%0.00%
Sector / categoryUS ListedUS Listed
Smaller drawdown: FSEA -21.5% vs -84.2%Higher 5y return: FSEA +44.2% vs -39.5%
-83%0%+47%2025-09-052026-08-27
Both assets over the last year, indexed to 100 at the starting week. FSEA · VITL

Year-by-year returns

YearFSEAVITL
2022-10.5%-17.4%
2023-32.7%+5.2%
2024+30.6%+140.2%
2025+31.5%-15.3%
2026+29.7%-67.3%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are FSEA and VITL good diversifiers for each other?

By historical standards, yes. A correlation of -0.27 means the two rarely move for the same reasons.

FAQ

What is the correlation between FSEA and VITL?

The FSEA/VITL correlation stands at -0.27 on a 3-year window (1 year: -0.46, 5 years: -0.18), computed from weekly returns as of 2026-08-27.

Is VITL a good diversifier for FSEA?

By historical standards, yes. A correlation of -0.27 means the two rarely move for the same reasons.

What does a correlation of -0.27 mean?

On the −1 to +1 scale, -0.27 describes how much the two returns move together: +1 is lockstep, 0 is independence, negative values mean opposite directions. It says nothing about which performed better.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/fsea-vs-vitl.json

FSEA vs VITL: 3-year weekly correlation -0.27FSEA vs VITL-0.27

Markdown for the live badge, attribution link included:

[![FSEA vs VITL correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/fsea-vs-vitl.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/fsea-vs-vitl/)

The core API is free. Terms and every endpoint in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: FSEA correlations · VITL correlations