PairBook
HomeFSEA › FSEA vs L

FSEA vs L: Correlation

First Seacoast Bancorp, Inc. (FSEA) and Loews Corporation (L) show a negative relationship: their 3-year correlation of weekly returns is -0.19.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
-0.19
negative
Correlation (1Y)
-0.32
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
-0.05
long-run
Ann. covariance
-106.6
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are FSEA and L?

Over the past 3 years, FSEA and L moved with a correlation of -0.19, which is negative, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. Lately the two have drifted apart, with the 1-year correlation at -0.32 versus -0.19 over 3 years. Over 5 years the correlation is -0.05, and the annualized covariance of weekly returns is -106.6 %².

By 3-year correlation, L places #16 of the 47 assets tracked against FSEA. The last year tells two different stories: FSEA led by 34.7 percentage points, +48.9% for FSEA against +14.2% for L. Note the risk asymmetry: FSEA runs 2.0 times the annualized volatility of the other leg, so equal-weighting the two is not an equal-risk position.

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

FSEA vs L: side by side

FSEA (First Seacoast Bancorp, Inc.)L (Loews Corporation)
1-year return+48.9%+14.2%
5-year return+44.2%+100.1%
Volatility (ann.)33.2%16.6%
Beta vs S&P 5000.190.33
Max drawdown (3Y)-21.5%-12.2%
Market cap$0.1B$22.5B
P/E (trailing)13.5
Dividend yield0.00%0.23%
Sector / categoryUS ListedFinancials
Higher yield: L 0.23% vs 0.00%Smaller drawdown: L -12.2% vs -21.5%Higher 5y return: L +100.1% vs +44.2%
-4%0%+47%2025-09-052026-08-27
Twelve months of weekly closes, each series rebased to 100. FSEA · L

Year-by-year returns

YearFSEAL
2022-10.5%+1.4%
2023-32.7%+19.8%
2024+30.6%+22.1%
2025+31.5%+24.7%
2026+29.7%+4.5%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are FSEA and L good diversifiers for each other?

By historical standards, yes. A correlation of -0.19 means the two rarely move for the same reasons.

FAQ

What is the correlation between FSEA and L?

Using weekly returns as of 2026-08-27: -0.19 over 3 years, with -0.32 over the last year and -0.05 over 5 years.

Is L a good diversifier for FSEA?

By historical standards, yes. A correlation of -0.19 means the two rarely move for the same reasons.

What does a correlation of -0.19 mean?

Correlation ranges from −1 to +1. Values near +1 mean two assets move together, near 0 that they move independently, and negative values that they tend to move in opposite directions. It measures co-movement, not performance.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/fsea-vs-l.json

FSEA vs L: 3-year weekly correlation -0.19FSEA vs L-0.19

Drop this badge in a README or notebook; it updates with the data:

[![FSEA vs L correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/fsea-vs-l.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/fsea-vs-l/)

The core API is free. Terms and every endpoint in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: FSEA correlations · L correlations