PairBook
HomeFRT › FRT vs IRM

FRT vs IRM: Correlation

How closely do Federal Realty Investment Trust (FRT) and Iron Mountain (IRM) trade together? Their weekly returns over three years give a correlation of 0.47, which is moderate.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
0.47
moderate
Correlation (1Y)
0.35
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
0.56
long-run
Ann. covariance
282.8
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are FRT and IRM?

On 3 years of weekly data the FRT/IRM correlation comes out at 0.47, moderate. Lately the two have drifted apart, with the 1-year correlation at 0.35 versus 0.47 over 3 years. The 5-year figure is 0.56, and annualized covariance runs at 282.8 %².

By 3-year correlation, IRM places #30 of the 46 assets tracked against FRT. The last year tells two different stories: IRM led by 16.5 percentage points, +21.6% for FRT against +38.1% for IRM. Across three years, the rolling one-year figure varied moderately, from 0.35 to 0.80. Risk is not evenly split, since IRM carries 1.6 times the volatility of the other side.

+1.0+0.50-0.5-1.020232026-08-27
Rolling one-year correlation of weekly returns over the past three years.
How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

FRT vs IRM: side by side

FRT (Federal Realty Investment Trust)IRM (Iron Mountain)
1-year return+21.6%+38.1%
5-year return+18.8%+219.3%
Volatility (ann.)19.5%30.8%
Beta vs S&P 5000.530.96
Max drawdown (3Y)-27.4%-39.0%
Market cap$10.2B$36.5B
P/E (trailing)23.686.4
Dividend yield3.84%2.78%
Sector / categoryReal EstateReal Estate
Lower P/E: FRT 23.6 vs 86.4Higher yield: FRT 3.84% vs 2.78%Smaller drawdown: FRT -27.4% vs -39.0%Higher 5y return: IRM +219.3% vs +18.8%
-12%0%+49%2025-09-052026-08-27
Price paths over the last 12 months, both indexed to 100 at the start (weekly closes). FRT · IRM

Year-by-year returns

YearFRTIRM
2022-22.7%-0.1%
2023+6.6%+46.5%
2024+12.1%+54.5%
2025-5.9%-18.2%
2026+19.7%+50.1%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are FRT and IRM good diversifiers for each other?

A fair diversifier. At 0.47, enough of each asset's movement is its own that the pair has smoothed outcomes historically.

FAQ

What is the correlation between FRT and IRM?

As of 2026-08-27, the correlation of weekly returns between FRT and IRM is 0.47 over 3 years, 0.35 over 1 year and 0.56 over 5 years.

Is IRM a good diversifier for FRT?

A fair diversifier. At 0.47, enough of each asset's movement is its own that the pair has smoothed outcomes historically.

What does a correlation of 0.47 mean?

On the −1 to +1 scale, 0.47 describes how much the two returns move together: +1 is lockstep, 0 is independence, negative values mean opposite directions. It says nothing about which performed better.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/frt-vs-irm.json

FRT vs IRM: 3-year weekly correlation 0.47FRT vs IRM0.47

Embed this badge (it refreshes with the data), with attribution:

[![FRT vs IRM correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/frt-vs-irm.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/frt-vs-irm/)

Free with attribution; caching and terms are described in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: FRT correlations · IRM correlations