PairBook
HomeFRAF › FRAF vs OCGN

FRAF vs OCGN: Correlation

Franklin Financial Services Corporation (FRAF) and Ocugen, Inc. (OCGN) show a negative relationship: their 3-year correlation of weekly returns is -0.24.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
-0.24
negative
Correlation (1Y)
0.04
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
-0.15
long-run
Ann. covariance
-726.6
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are FRAF and OCGN?

On 3 years of weekly data the FRAF/OCGN correlation comes out at -0.24, negative, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. Lately the two have moved closer together, with the 1-year correlation at 0.04 versus -0.24 over 3 years. The 5-year figure is -0.15, and annualized covariance runs at -726.6 %².

OCGN is close to the least connected end of FRAF's tracked universe, ranking #14 of 15. Over the last 12 months FRAF came out ahead by 5.1 percentage points (+36.8% against +31.7%). Note the risk asymmetry: OCGN runs 3.0 times the annualized volatility of the other leg, so equal-weighting the two is not an equal-risk position.

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

FRAF vs OCGN: side by side

FRAF (Franklin Financial Services Corporation)OCGN (Ocugen, Inc.)
1-year return+36.8%+31.7%
5-year return+133.8%-81.2%
Volatility (ann.)31.7%95.8%
Beta vs S&P 5000.221.22
Max drawdown (3Y)-25.5%-73.9%
Market cap$0.3B$0.5B
P/E (trailing)11.3
Dividend yield2.14%0.00%
Sector / categoryUS ListedUS Listed
Higher yield: FRAF 2.14% vs 0.00%Smaller drawdown: FRAF -25.5% vs -73.9%Higher 5y return: FRAF +133.8% vs -81.2%
-7%0%+141%2025-09-052026-08-27
Twelve months of weekly closes, each series rebased to 100. FRAF · OCGN

Year-by-year returns

YearFRAFOCGN
2022+13.5%-71.4%
2023-8.8%-55.8%
2024-1.4%+40.0%
2025+73.5%+67.7%
2026+25.9%+1.5%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are FRAF and OCGN good diversifiers for each other?

Yes. With a correlation of -0.24, FRAF and OCGN have moved largely independently, which makes them a genuinely diversifying pair by historical standards.

FAQ

What is the correlation between FRAF and OCGN?

Using weekly returns as of 2026-08-27: -0.24 over 3 years, with 0.04 over the last year and -0.15 over 5 years.

Is OCGN a good diversifier for FRAF?

Yes. With a correlation of -0.24, FRAF and OCGN have moved largely independently, which makes them a genuinely diversifying pair by historical standards.

What does a correlation of -0.24 mean?

A reading of -0.24 sits on a scale from −1 (opposite moves) through 0 (unrelated) to +1 (identical moves). Correlation captures direction, not magnitude or performance.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/fraf-vs-ocgn.json

FRAF vs OCGN: 3-year weekly correlation -0.24FRAF vs OCGN-0.24

Markdown for the live badge, attribution link included:

[![FRAF vs OCGN correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/fraf-vs-ocgn.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/fraf-vs-ocgn/)

Free with attribution; caching and terms are described in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: FRAF correlations · OCGN correlations