PairBook
HomeFRA › FRA vs RCS

FRA vs RCS: Correlation

Blackrock Floating Rate Income Strategies Fund Inc (FRA) and PIMCO Strategic Income Fund, Inc. (RCS) show a moderate relationship: their 3-year correlation of weekly returns is 0.48.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
0.48
moderate
Correlation (1Y)
0.35
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
0.45
long-run
Ann. covariance
149.2
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are FRA and RCS?

Over the past 3 years, FRA and RCS moved with a correlation of 0.48, which is moderate. Lately the two have drifted apart, with the 1-year correlation at 0.35 versus 0.48 over 3 years. Over 5 years the correlation is 0.45, and the annualized covariance of weekly returns is 149.2 %².

By 3-year correlation, RCS places #8 of the 14 assets tracked against FRA. On 12-month performance FRA holds a 14.3-point edge, -6.5% against -20.8%. Note the risk asymmetry: RCS runs 2.3 times the annualized volatility of the other leg, so equal-weighting the two is not an equal-risk position.

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

FRA vs RCS: side by side

FRA (Blackrock Floating Rate Income Strategies Fund Inc)RCS (PIMCO Strategic Income Fund, Inc.)
1-year return-6.5%-20.8%
5-year return+37.4%+5.4%
Volatility (ann.)11.6%27.0%
Beta vs S&P 5000.440.77
Max drawdown (3Y)-18.8%-32.9%
Market cap$0.2B
P/E (trailing)15.66.9
Dividend yield13.61%9.11%
Sector / categoryUS ListedUS Listed
Lower P/E: RCS 6.9 vs 15.6Higher yield: FRA 13.61% vs 9.11%Smaller drawdown: FRA -18.8% vs -32.9%Higher 5y return: FRA +37.4% vs +5.4%
-26%0%+8%2025-09-052026-08-27
Both assets over the last year, indexed to 100 at the starting week. FRA · RCS

Year-by-year returns

YearFRARCS
2022-10.6%-19.5%
2023+25.5%+37.6%
2024+21.6%+37.5%
2025-3.7%-21.5%
2026+1.5%+0.4%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are FRA and RCS good diversifiers for each other?

Yes, to a useful degree: a correlation of 0.48 leaves real independence between the two, which historically damped combined volatility.

FAQ

What is the correlation between FRA and RCS?

As of 2026-08-27, the correlation of weekly returns between FRA and RCS is 0.48 over 3 years, 0.35 over 1 year and 0.45 over 5 years.

Is RCS a good diversifier for FRA?

Yes, to a useful degree: a correlation of 0.48 leaves real independence between the two, which historically damped combined volatility.

What does a correlation of 0.48 mean?

On the −1 to +1 scale, 0.48 describes how much the two returns move together: +1 is lockstep, 0 is independence, negative values mean opposite directions. It says nothing about which performed better.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/fra-vs-rcs.json

FRA vs RCS: 3-year weekly correlation 0.48FRA vs RCS0.48

Drop this badge in a README or notebook; it updates with the data:

[![FRA vs RCS correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/fra-vs-rcs.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/fra-vs-rcs/)

The core API is free. Terms and every endpoint in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: FRA correlations · RCS correlations