PairBook
HomeFORM › FORM vs SMH

FORM vs SMH: Correlation

How closely do FormFactor, Inc. (FORM) and VanEck Semiconductor ETF (SMH) trade together? Their weekly returns over three years give a correlation of 0.69, which is strong.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
0.69
strong
Correlation (1Y)
0.65
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
0.69
long-run
Ann. covariance
1358.8
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are FORM and SMH?

On 3 years of weekly data the FORM/SMH correlation comes out at 0.69, strong. Recent behaviour matches the longer record: 0.65 over 1 year against 0.69 over 3. The 5-year figure is 0.69, and annualized covariance runs at 1358.8 %².

By 3-year correlation, SMH places #5 of the 14 assets tracked against FORM. Their recent paths diverged sharply: over the last 12 months FORM outperformed by 183.5 percentage points (+276.6% for FORM against +93.1% for SMH). One caveat on sizing: FORM is 1.7 times as volatile as the other leg, so an equal-dollar split is far from equal-risk.

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

FORM vs SMH: side by side

FORM (FormFactor, Inc.)SMH (VanEck Semiconductor ETF)
1-year return+276.6%+93.1%
5-year return+178.6%+332.8%
Volatility (ann.)58.1%33.7%
Beta vs S&P 5002.081.91
Max drawdown (3Y)-62.7%-35.7%
Market cap$8.6B
P/E (trailing)74.5
Dividend yield0.00%
Sector / categoryUS ListedETF · Thematic
Smaller drawdown: SMH -35.7% vs -62.7%Higher 5y return: SMH +332.8% vs +178.6%
0%+428%2025-09-052026-08-27
Both assets over the last year, indexed to 100 at the starting week. FORM · SMH

Year-by-year returns

YearFORMSMH
2022-51.4%-33.5%
2023+87.6%+73.4%
2024+5.5%+39.1%
2025+26.8%+49.2%
2026+97.6%+59.1%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are FORM and SMH good diversifiers for each other?

To a limited degree. At 0.69 the two still catch most of the same waves, so the pair smooths returns a little without insulating either from a shared selloff.

FAQ

What is the correlation between FORM and SMH?

Using weekly returns as of 2026-08-27: 0.69 over 3 years, with 0.65 over the last year and 0.69 over 5 years.

Is SMH a good diversifier for FORM?

To a limited degree. At 0.69 the two still catch most of the same waves, so the pair smooths returns a little without insulating either from a shared selloff.

What does a correlation of 0.69 mean?

A reading of 0.69 sits on a scale from −1 (opposite moves) through 0 (unrelated) to +1 (identical moves). Correlation captures direction, not magnitude or performance.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/form-vs-smh.json

FORM vs SMH: 3-year weekly correlation 0.69FORM vs SMH0.69

Drop this badge in a README or notebook; it updates with the data:

[![FORM vs SMH correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/form-vs-smh.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/form-vs-smh/)

Free with attribution; caching and terms are described in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: FORM correlations · SMH correlations