FNGR vs LFMD: Correlation
Measured on weekly returns over the past three years, FingerMotion, Inc. (FNGR) and LifeMD, Inc. (LFMD) carry a correlation of 0.33, a moderate link.
Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology
How correlated are FNGR and LFMD?
Over the past 3 years, FNGR and LFMD moved with a correlation of 0.33, which is moderate. Little has changed lately, as the 1-year reading of 0.28 lands near the 3-year figure. Over 5 years the correlation is 0.15, and the annualized covariance of weekly returns is 2643.8 %².
Few assets follow FNGR as closely as LFMD, which ranks #2 of 10 tracked partners. The last year tells two different stories: LFMD led by 40.1 percentage points, -89.2% for FNGR against -49.1% for LFMD.
How is this computed?
Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.
FNGR vs LFMD: side by side
| FNGR (FingerMotion, Inc.) | LFMD (LifeMD, Inc.) | |
|---|---|---|
| 1-year return | -89.2% | -49.1% |
| 5-year return | -96.1% | -58.8% |
| Volatility (ann.) | 94.3% | 84.5% |
| Beta vs S&P 500 | 0.99 | 1.35 |
| Max drawdown (3Y) | -97.9% | -82.5% |
| Market cap | – | $0.2B |
| P/E (trailing) | – | – |
| Dividend yield | 0.00% | 0.00% |
| Sector / category | US Listed | US Listed |
Year-by-year returns
| Year | FNGR | LFMD |
|---|---|---|
| 2022 | -60.5% | -49.9% |
| 2023 | +43.1% | +327.3% |
| 2024 | -70.1% | -40.3% |
| 2025 | +2.5% | -31.1% |
| 2026 | -85.9% | -4.4% |
Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.
Are FNGR and LFMD good diversifiers for each other?
A fair diversifier. At 0.33, enough of each asset's movement is its own that the pair has smoothed outcomes historically.
FAQ
What is the correlation between FNGR and LFMD?
Using weekly returns as of 2026-08-27: 0.33 over 3 years, with 0.28 over the last year and 0.15 over 5 years.
Is LFMD a good diversifier for FNGR?
A fair diversifier. At 0.33, enough of each asset's movement is its own that the pair has smoothed outcomes historically.
What does a correlation of 0.33 mean?
On the −1 to +1 scale, 0.33 describes how much the two returns move together: +1 is lockstep, 0 is independence, negative values mean opposite directions. It says nothing about which performed better.
Use this data
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/fngr-vs-lfmd.json
Markdown for the live badge, attribution link included:
[](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/fngr-vs-lfmd/)
Free with attribution; caching and terms are described in the API documentation.
Related comparisons
Hubs: FNGR correlations · LFMD correlations
