FNGD vs ZETA: Correlation
Measured on weekly returns over the past three years, MicroSectors FANG Index -3X Inverse Leveraged ETNs due (FNGD) and Zeta Global Holdings Corp. (ZETA) carry a correlation of -0.44, a negative link.
Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology
How correlated are FNGD and ZETA?
On 3 years of weekly data the FNGD/ZETA correlation comes out at -0.44, negative, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. Little has changed lately, as the 1-year reading of -0.53 lands near the 3-year figure. The 5-year figure is -0.45, and annualized covariance runs at -2412.8 %².
Among the 1743 assets we track against FNGD, ZETA ranks #1490 by 3-year correlation. Correlation aside, the last 12 months split them widely, with ZETA ahead by 107.4 points (-55.7% versus +51.7%).
How is this computed?
Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.
FNGD vs ZETA: side by side
| FNGD (MicroSectors FANG Index -3X Inverse Leveraged ETNs due) | ZETA (Zeta Global Holdings Corp.) | |
|---|---|---|
| 1-year return | -55.7% | +51.7% |
| 5-year return | -99.4% | +373.7% |
| Volatility (ann.) | 75.7% | 71.9% |
| Beta vs S&P 500 | -4.54 | 2.30 |
| Max drawdown (3Y) | -97.6% | -70.0% |
| Market cap | – | $7.5B |
| P/E (trailing) | 20.6 | – |
| Dividend yield | 0.00% | 0.00% |
| Sector / category | US Listed | US Listed |
Year-by-year returns
| Year | FNGD | ZETA |
|---|---|---|
| 2022 | +52.2% | -3.0% |
| 2023 | -90.1% | +8.0% |
| 2024 | -76.6% | +104.0% |
| 2025 | -61.4% | +13.1% |
| 2026 | -49.5% | +48.5% |
Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.
Are FNGD and ZETA good diversifiers for each other?
Yes. With a correlation of -0.44, FNGD and ZETA have moved largely independently, which makes them a genuinely diversifying pair by historical standards.
FAQ
What is the correlation between FNGD and ZETA?
Using weekly returns as of 2026-08-27: -0.44 over 3 years, with -0.53 over the last year and -0.45 over 5 years.
Is ZETA a good diversifier for FNGD?
Yes. With a correlation of -0.44, FNGD and ZETA have moved largely independently, which makes them a genuinely diversifying pair by historical standards.
What does a correlation of -0.44 mean?
Correlation ranges from −1 to +1. Values near +1 mean two assets move together, near 0 that they move independently, and negative values that they tend to move in opposite directions. It measures co-movement, not performance.
Use this data
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/fngd-vs-zeta.json
Embed this badge (it refreshes with the data), with attribution:
[](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/fngd-vs-zeta/)
The core API is free. Terms and every endpoint in the API documentation.
Related comparisons
Hubs: FNGD correlations · ZETA correlations
