FNGD vs VCYT: Correlation
Measured on weekly returns over the past three years, MicroSectors FANG Index -3X Inverse Leveraged ETNs due (FNGD) and Veracyte, Inc. (VCYT) carry a correlation of -0.29, a negative link.
Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology
How correlated are FNGD and VCYT?
On 3 years of weekly data the FNGD/VCYT correlation comes out at -0.29, negative, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. Lately the two have moved closer together, with the 1-year correlation at -0.11 versus -0.29 over 3 years. The 5-year figure is -0.40, and annualized covariance runs at -1168.5 %².
By 3-year correlation, VCYT places #806 of the 1743 assets tracked against FNGD. The last year tells two different stories: VCYT led by 113.9 percentage points, -55.7% for FNGD against +58.2% for VCYT.
How is this computed?
Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.
FNGD vs VCYT: side by side
| FNGD (MicroSectors FANG Index -3X Inverse Leveraged ETNs due) | VCYT (Veracyte, Inc.) | |
|---|---|---|
| 1-year return | -55.7% | +58.2% |
| 5-year return | -99.4% | -7.1% |
| Volatility (ann.) | 75.7% | 53.3% |
| Beta vs S&P 500 | -4.54 | 1.37 |
| Max drawdown (3Y) | -97.6% | -50.1% |
| Market cap | – | $3.6B |
| P/E (trailing) | 20.6 | 31.6 |
| Dividend yield | 0.00% | 0.00% |
| Sector / category | US Listed | US Listed |
Year-by-year returns
| Year | FNGD | VCYT |
|---|---|---|
| 2022 | +52.2% | -42.4% |
| 2023 | -90.1% | +15.9% |
| 2024 | -76.6% | +43.9% |
| 2025 | -61.4% | +6.3% |
| 2026 | -49.5% | +7.5% |
Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.
Are FNGD and VCYT good diversifiers for each other?
By historical standards, yes. A correlation of -0.29 means the two rarely move for the same reasons.
FAQ
What is the correlation between FNGD and VCYT?
Using weekly returns as of 2026-08-27: -0.29 over 3 years, with -0.11 over the last year and -0.40 over 5 years.
Is VCYT a good diversifier for FNGD?
By historical standards, yes. A correlation of -0.29 means the two rarely move for the same reasons.
What does a correlation of -0.29 mean?
A reading of -0.29 sits on a scale from −1 (opposite moves) through 0 (unrelated) to +1 (identical moves). Correlation captures direction, not magnitude or performance.
Use this data
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/fngd-vs-vcyt.json
Markdown for the live badge, attribution link included:
[](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/fngd-vs-vcyt/)
No key needed, free to use. Full endpoint list in the API documentation.
Related comparisons
Hubs: FNGD correlations · VCYT correlations
