PairBook
HomeFNGD › FNGD vs ULTA

FNGD vs ULTA: Correlation

MicroSectors FANG Index -3X Inverse Leveraged ETNs due (FNGD) and Ulta Beauty (ULTA) show a negative relationship: their 3-year correlation of weekly returns is -0.24.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
-0.24
negative
Correlation (1Y)
-0.18
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
-0.26
long-run
Ann. covariance
-638.4
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are FNGD and ULTA?

On 3 years of weekly data the FNGD/ULTA correlation comes out at -0.24, negative, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. The relationship has been stable: the 1-year correlation (-0.18) sits close to the 3-year figure. The 5-year figure is -0.26, and annualized covariance runs at -638.4 %².

By 3-year correlation, ULTA places #377 of the 1743 assets tracked against FNGD. The last year tells two different stories: ULTA led by 56.9 percentage points, -55.7% for FNGD against +1.2% for ULTA. Risk is not evenly split, since FNGD carries 2.1 times the volatility of the other side.

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

FNGD vs ULTA: side by side

FNGD (MicroSectors FANG Index -3X Inverse Leveraged ETNs due)ULTA (Ulta Beauty)
1-year return-55.7%+1.2%
5-year return-99.4%+41.0%
Volatility (ann.)75.7%35.3%
Beta vs S&P 500-4.540.75
Max drawdown (3Y)-97.6%-44.6%
Market cap$23.2B
P/E (trailing)20.620.4
Dividend yield0.00%0.00%
Sector / categoryUS ListedConsumer Discretionary
Lower P/E: ULTA 20.4 vs 20.6Smaller drawdown: ULTA -44.6% vs -97.6%Higher 5y return: ULTA +41.0% vs -99.4%
-52%0%+49%2025-09-052026-08-27
Twelve months of weekly closes, each series rebased to 100. FNGD · ULTA

Year-by-year returns

YearFNGDULTA
2022+52.2%+13.8%
2023-90.1%+4.5%
2024-76.6%-11.2%
2025-61.4%+39.1%
2026-49.5%-10.7%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are FNGD and ULTA good diversifiers for each other?

Yes: at -0.24, the two have gone their own ways historically, which is what genuine diversification looks like.

FAQ

What is the correlation between FNGD and ULTA?

The FNGD/ULTA correlation stands at -0.24 on a 3-year window (1 year: -0.18, 5 years: -0.26), computed from weekly returns as of 2026-08-27.

Is ULTA a good diversifier for FNGD?

Yes: at -0.24, the two have gone their own ways historically, which is what genuine diversification looks like.

What does a correlation of -0.24 mean?

On the −1 to +1 scale, -0.24 describes how much the two returns move together: +1 is lockstep, 0 is independence, negative values mean opposite directions. It says nothing about which performed better.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/fngd-vs-ulta.json

FNGD vs ULTA: 3-year weekly correlation -0.24FNGD vs ULTA-0.24

Embed this badge (it refreshes with the data), with attribution:

[![FNGD vs ULTA correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/fngd-vs-ulta.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/fngd-vs-ulta/)

The core API is free. Terms and every endpoint in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: FNGD correlations · ULTA correlations