FNGD vs TTMI: Correlation
MicroSectors FANG Index -3X Inverse Leveraged ETNs due (FNGD) and TTM Technologies, Inc. (TTMI) show a negative relationship: their 3-year correlation of weekly returns is -0.39.
Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology
How correlated are FNGD and TTMI?
Across a 3-year window, the weekly returns of FNGD and TTMI correlate at -0.39, negative, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. Lately the two have moved closer together, with the 1-year correlation at -0.27 versus -0.39 over 3 years. Stretching to 5 years gives -0.40, with an annualized covariance of -1803.2 %².
Within FNGD's tracked universe of 1743 assets, TTMI comes in at #1335 by 3-year correlation. Correlation aside, the last 12 months split them widely, with TTMI ahead by 236.0 points (-55.7% versus +180.3%).
How is this computed?
Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.
FNGD vs TTMI: side by side
| FNGD (MicroSectors FANG Index -3X Inverse Leveraged ETNs due) | TTMI (TTM Technologies, Inc.) | |
|---|---|---|
| 1-year return | -55.7% | +180.3% |
| 5-year return | -99.4% | +785.9% |
| Volatility (ann.) | 75.7% | 60.7% |
| Beta vs S&P 500 | -4.54 | 2.23 |
| Max drawdown (3Y) | -97.6% | -54.0% |
| Market cap | – | $13.1B |
| P/E (trailing) | 20.6 | 54.9 |
| Dividend yield | 0.00% | 0.00% |
| Sector / category | US Listed | US Listed |
Year-by-year returns
| Year | FNGD | TTMI |
|---|---|---|
| 2022 | +52.2% | +1.2% |
| 2023 | -90.1% | +4.8% |
| 2024 | -76.6% | +56.5% |
| 2025 | -61.4% | +178.8% |
| 2026 | -49.5% | +80.8% |
Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.
Are FNGD and TTMI good diversifiers for each other?
Yes. With a correlation of -0.39, FNGD and TTMI have moved largely independently, which makes them a genuinely diversifying pair by historical standards.
FAQ
What is the correlation between FNGD and TTMI?
Using weekly returns as of 2026-08-27: -0.39 over 3 years, with -0.27 over the last year and -0.40 over 5 years.
Is TTMI a good diversifier for FNGD?
Yes. With a correlation of -0.39, FNGD and TTMI have moved largely independently, which makes them a genuinely diversifying pair by historical standards.
What does a correlation of -0.39 mean?
Correlation ranges from −1 to +1. Values near +1 mean two assets move together, near 0 that they move independently, and negative values that they tend to move in opposite directions. It measures co-movement, not performance.
Use this data
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/fngd-vs-ttmi.json
Embed this badge (it refreshes with the data), with attribution:
[](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/fngd-vs-ttmi/)
The core API is free. Terms and every endpoint in the API documentation.
Related comparisons
Hubs: FNGD correlations · TTMI correlations
