PairBook
HomeFNGD › FNGD vs TGB

FNGD vs TGB: Correlation

How closely do MicroSectors FANG Index -3X Inverse Leveraged ETNs due (FNGD) and Trekor Metals Limited (TGB) trade together? Their weekly returns over three years give a correlation of -0.36, which is negative.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
-0.36
negative
Correlation (1Y)
-0.40
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
-0.34
long-run
Ann. covariance
-1705.3
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are FNGD and TGB?

Over the past 3 years, FNGD and TGB moved with a correlation of -0.36, which is negative, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. Little has changed lately, as the 1-year reading of -0.40 lands near the 3-year figure. Over 5 years the correlation is -0.34, and the annualized covariance of weekly returns is -1705.3 %².

Among the 1743 assets we track against FNGD, TGB ranks #1206 by 3-year correlation. Correlation aside, the last 12 months split them widely, with TGB ahead by 260.1 points (-55.7% versus +204.4%).

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

FNGD vs TGB: side by side

FNGD (MicroSectors FANG Index -3X Inverse Leveraged ETNs due)TGB (Trekor Metals Limited)
1-year return-55.7%+204.4%
5-year return-99.4%+450.0%
Volatility (ann.)75.7%62.1%
Beta vs S&P 500-4.541.89
Max drawdown (3Y)-97.6%-44.3%
Market cap$3.5B
P/E (trailing)20.6484.0
Dividend yield0.00%0.00%
Sector / categoryUS ListedUS Listed
Lower P/E: FNGD 20.6 vs 484.0Smaller drawdown: TGB -44.3% vs -97.6%Higher 5y return: TGB +450.0% vs -99.4%
-52%0%+191%2025-09-052026-08-27
Both assets over the last year, indexed to 100 at the starting week. FNGD · TGB

Year-by-year returns

YearFNGDTGB
2022+52.2%-28.3%
2023-90.1%-4.8%
2024-76.6%+38.6%
2025-61.4%+191.8%
2026-49.5%+71.0%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are FNGD and TGB good diversifiers for each other?

Yes: at -0.36, the two have gone their own ways historically, which is what genuine diversification looks like.

FAQ

What is the correlation between FNGD and TGB?

The FNGD/TGB correlation stands at -0.36 on a 3-year window (1 year: -0.40, 5 years: -0.34), computed from weekly returns as of 2026-08-27.

Is TGB a good diversifier for FNGD?

Yes: at -0.36, the two have gone their own ways historically, which is what genuine diversification looks like.

What does a correlation of -0.36 mean?

On the −1 to +1 scale, -0.36 describes how much the two returns move together: +1 is lockstep, 0 is independence, negative values mean opposite directions. It says nothing about which performed better.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/fngd-vs-tgb.json

FNGD vs TGB: 3-year weekly correlation -0.36FNGD vs TGB-0.36

Markdown for the live badge, attribution link included:

[![FNGD vs TGB correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/fngd-vs-tgb.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/fngd-vs-tgb/)

Free with attribution; caching and terms are described in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: FNGD correlations · TGB correlations