PairBook
HomeFNGD › FNGD vs TEAM

FNGD vs TEAM: Correlation

Measured on weekly returns over the past three years, MicroSectors FANG Index -3X Inverse Leveraged ETNs due (FNGD) and Atlassian Corporation (TEAM) carry a correlation of -0.47, a negative link.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
-0.47
negative
Correlation (1Y)
-0.55
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
-0.55
long-run
Ann. covariance
-2177.6
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are FNGD and TEAM?

Over the past 3 years, FNGD and TEAM moved with a correlation of -0.47, which is negative, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. Recent behaviour matches the longer record: -0.55 over 1 year against -0.47 over 3. Over 5 years the correlation is -0.55, and the annualized covariance of weekly returns is -2177.6 %².

Within FNGD's tracked universe of 1743 assets, TEAM comes in at #1544 by 3-year correlation. Their recent paths diverged sharply: over the last 12 months TEAM outperformed by 63.7 percentage points (-55.7% for FNGD against +8.0% for TEAM).

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

FNGD vs TEAM: side by side

FNGD (MicroSectors FANG Index -3X Inverse Leveraged ETNs due)TEAM (Atlassian Corporation)
1-year return-55.7%+8.0%
5-year return-99.4%-49.3%
Volatility (ann.)75.7%61.5%
Beta vs S&P 500-4.541.66
Max drawdown (3Y)-97.6%-82.3%
Market cap$47.0B
P/E (trailing)20.6
Dividend yield0.00%0.00%
Sector / categoryUS ListedUS Listed
Smaller drawdown: TEAM -82.3% vs -97.6%Higher 5y return: TEAM -49.3% vs -99.4%
-67%0%+49%2025-09-052026-08-27
Price paths over the last 12 months, both indexed to 100 at the start (weekly closes). FNGD · TEAM

Year-by-year returns

YearFNGDTEAM
2022+52.2%-66.3%
2023-90.1%+84.8%
2024-76.6%+2.3%
2025-61.4%-33.4%
2026-49.5%+14.5%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are FNGD and TEAM good diversifiers for each other?

By historical standards, yes. A correlation of -0.47 means the two rarely move for the same reasons.

FAQ

What is the correlation between FNGD and TEAM?

Using weekly returns as of 2026-08-27: -0.47 over 3 years, with -0.55 over the last year and -0.55 over 5 years.

Is TEAM a good diversifier for FNGD?

By historical standards, yes. A correlation of -0.47 means the two rarely move for the same reasons.

What does a correlation of -0.47 mean?

A reading of -0.47 sits on a scale from −1 (opposite moves) through 0 (unrelated) to +1 (identical moves). Correlation captures direction, not magnitude or performance.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/fngd-vs-team.json

FNGD vs TEAM: 3-year weekly correlation -0.47FNGD vs TEAM-0.47

Embed this badge (it refreshes with the data), with attribution:

[![FNGD vs TEAM correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/fngd-vs-team.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/fngd-vs-team/)

Free with attribution; caching and terms are described in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: FNGD correlations · TEAM correlations