FNGD vs TE: Correlation
How closely do MicroSectors FANG Index -3X Inverse Leveraged ETNs due (FNGD) and T1 Energy Inc. (TE) trade together? Their weekly returns over three years give a correlation of -0.28, which is negative.
Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology
How correlated are FNGD and TE?
On 3 years of weekly data the FNGD/TE correlation comes out at -0.28, negative, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. Little has changed lately, as the 1-year reading of -0.34 lands near the 3-year figure. The 5-year figure is -0.28, and annualized covariance runs at -2664.3 %².
By 3-year correlation, TE places #735 of the 1743 assets tracked against FNGD. Their recent paths diverged sharply: over the last 12 months TE outperformed by 269.6 percentage points (-55.7% for FNGD against +213.9% for TE). Note the risk asymmetry: TE runs 1.7 times the annualized volatility of the other leg, so equal-weighting the two is not an equal-risk position.
How is this computed?
Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.
FNGD vs TE: side by side
| FNGD (MicroSectors FANG Index -3X Inverse Leveraged ETNs due) | TE (T1 Energy Inc.) | |
|---|---|---|
| 1-year return | -55.7% | +213.9% |
| 5-year return | -99.4% | -44.5% |
| Volatility (ann.) | 75.7% | 127.8% |
| Beta vs S&P 500 | -4.54 | 2.71 |
| Max drawdown (3Y) | -97.6% | -85.5% |
| Market cap | – | $1.5B |
| P/E (trailing) | 20.6 | – |
| Dividend yield | 0.00% | 0.00% |
| Sector / category | US Listed | US Listed |
Year-by-year returns
| Year | FNGD | TE |
|---|---|---|
| 2022 | +52.2% | -22.4% |
| 2023 | -90.1% | -78.5% |
| 2024 | -76.6% | +38.0% |
| 2025 | -61.4% | +158.9% |
| 2026 | -49.5% | -25.7% |
Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.
Are FNGD and TE good diversifiers for each other?
Yes. With a correlation of -0.28, FNGD and TE have moved largely independently, which makes them a genuinely diversifying pair by historical standards.
FAQ
What is the correlation between FNGD and TE?
Using weekly returns as of 2026-08-27: -0.28 over 3 years, with -0.34 over the last year and -0.28 over 5 years.
Is TE a good diversifier for FNGD?
Yes. With a correlation of -0.28, FNGD and TE have moved largely independently, which makes them a genuinely diversifying pair by historical standards.
What does a correlation of -0.28 mean?
A reading of -0.28 sits on a scale from −1 (opposite moves) through 0 (unrelated) to +1 (identical moves). Correlation captures direction, not magnitude or performance.
Use this data
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/fngd-vs-te.json
Drop this badge in a README or notebook; it updates with the data:
[](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/fngd-vs-te/)
The core API is free. Terms and every endpoint in the API documentation.
Related comparisons
Hubs: FNGD correlations · TE correlations
