PairBook
HomeFNGD › FNGD vs STEM

FNGD vs STEM: Correlation

MicroSectors FANG Index -3X Inverse Leveraged ETNs due (FNGD) and Stem, Inc. (STEM) show a negative relationship: their 3-year correlation of weekly returns is -0.22.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
-0.22
negative
Correlation (1Y)
-0.49
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
-0.31
long-run
Ann. covariance
-2151.1
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are FNGD and STEM?

Across a 3-year window, the weekly returns of FNGD and STEM correlate at -0.22, negative, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. The link has loosened recently: the 1-year correlation (-0.49) runs below the 3-year figure (-0.22). Stretching to 5 years gives -0.31, with an annualized covariance of -2151.1 %².

By 3-year correlation, STEM places #206 of the 1743 assets tracked against FNGD. The trailing year gives FNGD the advantage: -55.7% versus -64.9%, a 9.2-point spread. Note the risk asymmetry: STEM runs 1.7 times the annualized volatility of the other leg, so equal-weighting the two is not an equal-risk position.

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

FNGD vs STEM: side by side

FNGD (MicroSectors FANG Index -3X Inverse Leveraged ETNs due)STEM (Stem, Inc.)
1-year return-55.7%-64.9%
5-year return-99.4%-98.9%
Volatility (ann.)75.7%129.9%
Beta vs S&P 500-4.542.49
Max drawdown (3Y)-97.6%-95.5%
Market cap$0.1B
P/E (trailing)20.6
Dividend yield0.00%0.00%
Sector / categoryUS ListedUS Listed
Smaller drawdown: STEM -95.5% vs -97.6%Higher 5y return: STEM -98.9% vs -99.4%
-61%0%+70%2025-09-052026-08-27
Twelve months of weekly closes, each series rebased to 100. FNGD · STEM

Year-by-year returns

YearFNGDSTEM
2022+52.2%-52.9%
2023-90.1%-56.6%
2024-76.6%-84.5%
2025-61.4%+24.8%
2026-49.5%-62.1%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are FNGD and STEM good diversifiers for each other?

By historical standards, yes. A correlation of -0.22 means the two rarely move for the same reasons.

FAQ

What is the correlation between FNGD and STEM?

Using weekly returns as of 2026-08-27: -0.22 over 3 years, with -0.49 over the last year and -0.31 over 5 years.

Is STEM a good diversifier for FNGD?

By historical standards, yes. A correlation of -0.22 means the two rarely move for the same reasons.

What does a correlation of -0.22 mean?

On the −1 to +1 scale, -0.22 describes how much the two returns move together: +1 is lockstep, 0 is independence, negative values mean opposite directions. It says nothing about which performed better.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/fngd-vs-stem.json

FNGD vs STEM: 3-year weekly correlation -0.22FNGD vs STEM-0.22

Embed this badge (it refreshes with the data), with attribution:

[![FNGD vs STEM correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/fngd-vs-stem.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/fngd-vs-stem/)

No key needed, free to use. Full endpoint list in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: FNGD correlations · STEM correlations