FNGD vs SNOA: Correlation
Measured on weekly returns over the past three years, MicroSectors FANG Index -3X Inverse Leveraged ETNs due (FNGD) and Sonoma Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (SNOA) carry a correlation of -0.31, a negative link.
Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology
How correlated are FNGD and SNOA?
Over the past 3 years, FNGD and SNOA moved with a correlation of -0.31, which is negative, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. Recent behaviour matches the longer record: -0.29 over 1 year against -0.31 over 3. Over 5 years the correlation is -0.33, and the annualized covariance of weekly returns is -3021.2 %².
By 3-year correlation, SNOA places #921 of the 1743 assets tracked against FNGD. Correlation aside, the last 12 months split them widely, with FNGD ahead by 15.2 points (-55.7% versus -70.9%). Note the risk asymmetry: SNOA runs 1.7 times the annualized volatility of the other leg, so equal-weighting the two is not an equal-risk position.
How is this computed?
Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.
FNGD vs SNOA: side by side
| FNGD (MicroSectors FANG Index -3X Inverse Leveraged ETNs due) | SNOA (Sonoma Pharmaceuticals, Inc.) | |
|---|---|---|
| 1-year return | -55.7% | -70.9% |
| 5-year return | -99.4% | -98.9% |
| Volatility (ann.) | 75.7% | 127.6% |
| Beta vs S&P 500 | -4.54 | 2.43 |
| Max drawdown (3Y) | -97.6% | -95.0% |
| Market cap | – | – |
| P/E (trailing) | 20.6 | – |
| Dividend yield | 0.00% | 0.00% |
| Sector / category | US Listed | US Listed |
Year-by-year returns
| Year | FNGD | SNOA |
|---|---|---|
| 2022 | +52.2% | -75.4% |
| 2023 | -90.1% | -83.9% |
| 2024 | -76.6% | -25.3% |
| 2025 | -61.4% | +35.3% |
| 2026 | -49.5% | -63.5% |
Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.
Are FNGD and SNOA good diversifiers for each other?
By historical standards, yes. A correlation of -0.31 means the two rarely move for the same reasons.
FAQ
What is the correlation between FNGD and SNOA?
Using weekly returns as of 2026-08-27: -0.31 over 3 years, with -0.29 over the last year and -0.33 over 5 years.
Is SNOA a good diversifier for FNGD?
By historical standards, yes. A correlation of -0.31 means the two rarely move for the same reasons.
What does a correlation of -0.31 mean?
Correlation ranges from −1 to +1. Values near +1 mean two assets move together, near 0 that they move independently, and negative values that they tend to move in opposite directions. It measures co-movement, not performance.
Use this data
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/fngd-vs-snoa.json
Embed this badge (it refreshes with the data), with attribution:
[](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/fngd-vs-snoa/)
Free with attribution; caching and terms are described in the API documentation.
Related comparisons
Hubs: FNGD correlations · SNOA correlations
