PairBook
HomeFNGD › FNGD vs SMCI

FNGD vs SMCI: Correlation

Measured on weekly returns over the past three years, MicroSectors FANG Index -3X Inverse Leveraged ETNs due (FNGD) and Supermicro (SMCI) carry a correlation of -0.42, a negative link.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
-0.42
negative
Correlation (1Y)
-0.35
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
-0.36
long-run
Ann. covariance
-3438.8
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are FNGD and SMCI?

Over the past 3 years, FNGD and SMCI moved with a correlation of -0.42, which is negative, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. The relationship has been stable: the 1-year correlation (-0.35) sits close to the 3-year figure. Over 5 years the correlation is -0.36, and the annualized covariance of weekly returns is -3438.8 %².

By 3-year correlation, SMCI places #1428 of the 1743 assets tracked against FNGD. Their recent paths diverged sharply: over the last 12 months SMCI outperformed by 41.6 percentage points (-55.7% for FNGD against -14.1% for SMCI).

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

FNGD vs SMCI: side by side

FNGD (MicroSectors FANG Index -3X Inverse Leveraged ETNs due)SMCI (Supermicro)
1-year return-55.7%-14.1%
5-year return-99.4%+983.4%
Volatility (ann.)75.7%107.1%
Beta vs S&P 500-4.543.08
Max drawdown (3Y)-97.6%-84.8%
Market cap$24.9B
P/E (trailing)20.611.5
Dividend yield0.00%0.00%
Sector / categoryUS ListedInformation Technology
Lower P/E: SMCI 11.5 vs 20.6Smaller drawdown: SMCI -84.8% vs -97.6%Higher 5y return: SMCI +983.4% vs -99.4%
-52%0%+49%2025-09-052026-08-27
Both assets over the last year, indexed to 100 at the starting week. FNGD · SMCI

Year-by-year returns

YearFNGDSMCI
2022+52.2%+86.8%
2023-90.1%+246.2%
2024-76.6%+7.2%
2025-61.4%-4.0%
2026-49.5%+31.4%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are FNGD and SMCI good diversifiers for each other?

By historical standards, yes. A correlation of -0.42 means the two rarely move for the same reasons.

FAQ

What is the correlation between FNGD and SMCI?

The FNGD/SMCI correlation stands at -0.42 on a 3-year window (1 year: -0.35, 5 years: -0.36), computed from weekly returns as of 2026-08-27.

Is SMCI a good diversifier for FNGD?

By historical standards, yes. A correlation of -0.42 means the two rarely move for the same reasons.

What does a correlation of -0.42 mean?

A reading of -0.42 sits on a scale from −1 (opposite moves) through 0 (unrelated) to +1 (identical moves). Correlation captures direction, not magnitude or performance.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/fngd-vs-smci.json

FNGD vs SMCI: 3-year weekly correlation -0.42FNGD vs SMCI-0.42

Markdown for the live badge, attribution link included:

[![FNGD vs SMCI correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/fngd-vs-smci.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/fngd-vs-smci/)

The core API is free. Terms and every endpoint in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: FNGD correlations · SMCI correlations