PairBook
HomeFNGD › FNGD vs S

FNGD vs S: Correlation

Measured on weekly returns over the past three years, MicroSectors FANG Index -3X Inverse Leveraged ETNs due (FNGD) and SentinelOne, Inc. (S) carry a correlation of -0.42, a negative link.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
-0.42
negative
Correlation (1Y)
-0.37
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
-0.49
long-run
Ann. covariance
-1525.5
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are FNGD and S?

Across a 3-year window, the weekly returns of FNGD and S correlate at -0.42, negative, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. Little has changed lately, as the 1-year reading of -0.37 lands near the 3-year figure. Stretching to 5 years gives -0.49, with an annualized covariance of -1525.5 %².

Among the 1743 assets we track against FNGD, S ranks #1427 by 3-year correlation. The last year tells two different stories: S led by 88.1 percentage points, -55.7% for FNGD against +32.4% for S. One caveat on sizing: FNGD is 1.6 times as volatile as the other leg, so an equal-dollar split is far from equal-risk.

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

FNGD vs S: side by side

FNGD (MicroSectors FANG Index -3X Inverse Leveraged ETNs due)S (SentinelOne, Inc.)
1-year return-55.7%+32.4%
5-year return-99.4%-65.2%
Volatility (ann.)75.7%48.4%
Beta vs S&P 500-4.541.43
Max drawdown (3Y)-97.6%-60.2%
Market cap$7.8B
P/E (trailing)20.6
Dividend yield0.00%0.00%
Sector / categoryUS ListedUS Listed
Smaller drawdown: S -60.2% vs -97.6%Higher 5y return: S -65.2% vs -99.4%
-52%0%+49%2025-09-052026-08-27
Price paths over the last 12 months, both indexed to 100 at the start (weekly closes). FNGD · S

Year-by-year returns

YearFNGDS
2022+52.2%-71.1%
2023-90.1%+88.1%
2024-76.6%-19.1%
2025-61.4%-32.4%
2026-49.5%+51.4%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are FNGD and S good diversifiers for each other?

By historical standards, yes. A correlation of -0.42 means the two rarely move for the same reasons.

FAQ

What is the correlation between FNGD and S?

As of 2026-08-27, the correlation of weekly returns between FNGD and S is -0.42 over 3 years, -0.37 over 1 year and -0.49 over 5 years.

Is S a good diversifier for FNGD?

By historical standards, yes. A correlation of -0.42 means the two rarely move for the same reasons.

What does a correlation of -0.42 mean?

On the −1 to +1 scale, -0.42 describes how much the two returns move together: +1 is lockstep, 0 is independence, negative values mean opposite directions. It says nothing about which performed better.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/fngd-vs-s.json

FNGD vs S: 3-year weekly correlation -0.42FNGD vs S-0.42

Markdown for the live badge, attribution link included:

[![FNGD vs S correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/fngd-vs-s.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/fngd-vs-s/)

No key needed, free to use. Full endpoint list in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: FNGD correlations · S correlations