FNGD vs RWT: Correlation
How closely do MicroSectors FANG Index -3X Inverse Leveraged ETNs due (FNGD) and Redwood Trust, Inc. (RWT) trade together? Their weekly returns over three years give a correlation of -0.21, which is negative.
Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology
How correlated are FNGD and RWT?
Across a 3-year window, the weekly returns of FNGD and RWT correlate at -0.21, negative, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. Recent behaviour matches the longer record: -0.12 over 1 year against -0.21 over 3. Stretching to 5 years gives -0.34, with an annualized covariance of -501.8 %².
By 3-year correlation, RWT places #135 of the 1743 assets tracked against FNGD. Their recent paths diverged sharply: over the last 12 months RWT outperformed by 43.9 percentage points (-55.7% for FNGD against -11.8% for RWT). Risk is not evenly split, since FNGD carries 2.4 times the volatility of the other side.
How is this computed?
Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.
FNGD vs RWT: side by side
| FNGD (MicroSectors FANG Index -3X Inverse Leveraged ETNs due) | RWT (Redwood Trust, Inc.) | |
|---|---|---|
| 1-year return | -55.7% | -11.8% |
| 5-year return | -99.4% | -35.7% |
| Volatility (ann.) | 75.7% | 31.6% |
| Beta vs S&P 500 | -4.54 | 0.87 |
| Max drawdown (3Y) | -97.6% | -33.8% |
| Market cap | – | $0.6B |
| P/E (trailing) | 20.6 | – |
| Dividend yield | 0.00% | 15.62% |
| Sector / category | US Listed | US Listed |
Year-by-year returns
| Year | FNGD | RWT |
|---|---|---|
| 2022 | +52.2% | -42.3% |
| 2023 | -90.1% | +21.6% |
| 2024 | -76.6% | -2.6% |
| 2025 | -61.4% | -4.1% |
| 2026 | -49.5% | -10.2% |
Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.
Are FNGD and RWT good diversifiers for each other?
Yes. With a correlation of -0.21, FNGD and RWT have moved largely independently, which makes them a genuinely diversifying pair by historical standards.
FAQ
What is the correlation between FNGD and RWT?
The FNGD/RWT correlation stands at -0.21 on a 3-year window (1 year: -0.12, 5 years: -0.34), computed from weekly returns as of 2026-08-27.
Is RWT a good diversifier for FNGD?
Yes. With a correlation of -0.21, FNGD and RWT have moved largely independently, which makes them a genuinely diversifying pair by historical standards.
What does a correlation of -0.21 mean?
Correlation ranges from −1 to +1. Values near +1 mean two assets move together, near 0 that they move independently, and negative values that they tend to move in opposite directions. It measures co-movement, not performance.
Use this data
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/fngd-vs-rwt.json
Markdown for the live badge, attribution link included:
[](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/fngd-vs-rwt/)
No key needed, free to use. Full endpoint list in the API documentation.
Related comparisons
Hubs: FNGD correlations · RWT correlations
