PairBook
HomeFNGD › FNGD vs RLGT

FNGD vs RLGT: Correlation

Measured on weekly returns over the past three years, MicroSectors FANG Index -3X Inverse Leveraged ETNs due (FNGD) and Radiant Logistics, Inc. (RLGT) carry a correlation of -0.26, a negative link.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
-0.26
negative
Correlation (1Y)
-0.07
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
-0.31
long-run
Ann. covariance
-601.5
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are FNGD and RLGT?

Across a 3-year window, the weekly returns of FNGD and RLGT correlate at -0.26, negative, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. The past 12 months show a tighter link (-0.07) than the 3-year average (-0.26). Stretching to 5 years gives -0.31, with an annualized covariance of -601.5 %².

Within FNGD's tracked universe of 1743 assets, RLGT comes in at #533 by 3-year correlation. The last year tells two different stories: RLGT led by 90.5 percentage points, -55.7% for FNGD against +34.8% for RLGT. One caveat on sizing: FNGD is 2.4 times as volatile as the other leg, so an equal-dollar split is far from equal-risk.

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

FNGD vs RLGT: side by side

FNGD (MicroSectors FANG Index -3X Inverse Leveraged ETNs due)RLGT (Radiant Logistics, Inc.)
1-year return-55.7%+34.8%
5-year return-99.4%+31.8%
Volatility (ann.)75.7%31.1%
Beta vs S&P 500-4.540.98
Max drawdown (3Y)-97.6%-29.3%
Market cap$0.4B
P/E (trailing)20.625.6
Dividend yield0.00%0.00%
Sector / categoryUS ListedUS Listed
Lower P/E: FNGD 20.6 vs 25.6Smaller drawdown: RLGT -29.3% vs -97.6%Higher 5y return: RLGT +31.8% vs -99.4%
-52%0%+49%2025-09-052026-08-27
Twelve months of weekly closes, each series rebased to 100. FNGD · RLGT

Year-by-year returns

YearFNGDRLGT
2022+52.2%-30.2%
2023-90.1%+30.5%
2024-76.6%+0.9%
2025-61.4%-5.5%
2026-49.5%+37.6%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are FNGD and RLGT good diversifiers for each other?

Yes. With a correlation of -0.26, FNGD and RLGT have moved largely independently, which makes them a genuinely diversifying pair by historical standards.

FAQ

What is the correlation between FNGD and RLGT?

Using weekly returns as of 2026-08-27: -0.26 over 3 years, with -0.07 over the last year and -0.31 over 5 years.

Is RLGT a good diversifier for FNGD?

Yes. With a correlation of -0.26, FNGD and RLGT have moved largely independently, which makes them a genuinely diversifying pair by historical standards.

What does a correlation of -0.26 mean?

Correlation ranges from −1 to +1. Values near +1 mean two assets move together, near 0 that they move independently, and negative values that they tend to move in opposite directions. It measures co-movement, not performance.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/fngd-vs-rlgt.json

FNGD vs RLGT: 3-year weekly correlation -0.26FNGD vs RLGT-0.26

Drop this badge in a README or notebook; it updates with the data:

[![FNGD vs RLGT correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/fngd-vs-rlgt.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/fngd-vs-rlgt/)

Free with attribution; caching and terms are described in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: FNGD correlations · RLGT correlations