PairBook
HomeFNGD › FNGD vs RDNT

FNGD vs RDNT: Correlation

Measured on weekly returns over the past three years, MicroSectors FANG Index -3X Inverse Leveraged ETNs due (FNGD) and RadNet, Inc. (RDNT) carry a correlation of -0.32, a negative link.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
-0.32
negative
Correlation (1Y)
-0.17
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
-0.38
long-run
Ann. covariance
-1043.7
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are FNGD and RDNT?

On 3 years of weekly data the FNGD/RDNT correlation comes out at -0.32, negative, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. The past 12 months show a tighter link (-0.17) than the 3-year average (-0.32). The 5-year figure is -0.38, and annualized covariance runs at -1043.7 %².

By 3-year correlation, RDNT places #983 of the 1743 assets tracked against FNGD. Their recent paths diverged sharply: over the last 12 months RDNT outperformed by 61.4 percentage points (-55.7% for FNGD against +5.7% for RDNT). One caveat on sizing: FNGD is 1.8 times as volatile as the other leg, so an equal-dollar split is far from equal-risk.

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

FNGD vs RDNT: side by side

FNGD (MicroSectors FANG Index -3X Inverse Leveraged ETNs due)RDNT (RadNet, Inc.)
1-year return-55.7%+5.7%
5-year return-99.4%+146.0%
Volatility (ann.)75.7%42.6%
Beta vs S&P 500-4.541.29
Max drawdown (3Y)-97.6%-46.8%
Market cap$5.9B
P/E (trailing)20.6
Dividend yield0.00%0.00%
Sector / categoryUS ListedUS Listed
Smaller drawdown: RDNT -46.8% vs -97.6%Higher 5y return: RDNT +146.0% vs -99.4%
-52%0%+49%2025-09-052026-08-27
Twelve months of weekly closes, each series rebased to 100. FNGD · RDNT

Year-by-year returns

YearFNGDRDNT
2022+52.2%-37.5%
2023-90.1%+84.7%
2024-76.6%+100.9%
2025-61.4%+2.2%
2026-49.5%+5.6%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are FNGD and RDNT good diversifiers for each other?

Yes. With a correlation of -0.32, FNGD and RDNT have moved largely independently, which makes them a genuinely diversifying pair by historical standards.

FAQ

What is the correlation between FNGD and RDNT?

As of 2026-08-27, the correlation of weekly returns between FNGD and RDNT is -0.32 over 3 years, -0.17 over 1 year and -0.38 over 5 years.

Is RDNT a good diversifier for FNGD?

Yes. With a correlation of -0.32, FNGD and RDNT have moved largely independently, which makes them a genuinely diversifying pair by historical standards.

What does a correlation of -0.32 mean?

A reading of -0.32 sits on a scale from −1 (opposite moves) through 0 (unrelated) to +1 (identical moves). Correlation captures direction, not magnitude or performance.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/fngd-vs-rdnt.json

FNGD vs RDNT: 3-year weekly correlation -0.32FNGD vs RDNT-0.32

Embed this badge (it refreshes with the data), with attribution:

[![FNGD vs RDNT correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/fngd-vs-rdnt.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/fngd-vs-rdnt/)

Free with attribution; caching and terms are described in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: FNGD correlations · RDNT correlations