PairBook
HomeFNGD › FNGD vs RCUS

FNGD vs RCUS: Correlation

How closely do MicroSectors FANG Index -3X Inverse Leveraged ETNs due (FNGD) and Arcus Biosciences, Inc. (RCUS) trade together? Their weekly returns over three years give a correlation of -0.35, which is negative.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
-0.35
negative
Correlation (1Y)
-0.21
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
-0.38
long-run
Ann. covariance
-1569.2
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are FNGD and RCUS?

On 3 years of weekly data the FNGD/RCUS correlation comes out at -0.35, negative, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. Lately the two have moved closer together, with the 1-year correlation at -0.21 versus -0.35 over 3 years. The 5-year figure is -0.38, and annualized covariance runs at -1569.2 %².

By 3-year correlation, RCUS places #1154 of the 1743 assets tracked against FNGD. Their recent paths diverged sharply: over the last 12 months RCUS outperformed by 245.4 percentage points (-55.7% for FNGD against +189.7% for RCUS).

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

FNGD vs RCUS: side by side

FNGD (MicroSectors FANG Index -3X Inverse Leveraged ETNs due)RCUS (Arcus Biosciences, Inc.)
1-year return-55.7%+189.7%
5-year return-99.4%+3.1%
Volatility (ann.)75.7%59.0%
Beta vs S&P 500-4.541.71
Max drawdown (3Y)-97.6%-69.5%
Market cap$3.8B
P/E (trailing)20.6
Dividend yield0.00%0.00%
Sector / categoryUS ListedUS Listed
Smaller drawdown: RCUS -69.5% vs -97.6%Higher 5y return: RCUS +3.1% vs -99.4%
-52%0%+154%2025-09-052026-08-27
Twelve months of weekly closes, each series rebased to 100. FNGD · RCUS

Year-by-year returns

YearFNGDRCUS
2022+52.2%-48.9%
2023-90.1%-7.6%
2024-76.6%-22.0%
2025-61.4%+60.0%
2026-49.5%+28.4%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are FNGD and RCUS good diversifiers for each other?

Yes. With a correlation of -0.35, FNGD and RCUS have moved largely independently, which makes them a genuinely diversifying pair by historical standards.

FAQ

What is the correlation between FNGD and RCUS?

The FNGD/RCUS correlation stands at -0.35 on a 3-year window (1 year: -0.21, 5 years: -0.38), computed from weekly returns as of 2026-08-27.

Is RCUS a good diversifier for FNGD?

Yes. With a correlation of -0.35, FNGD and RCUS have moved largely independently, which makes them a genuinely diversifying pair by historical standards.

What does a correlation of -0.35 mean?

On the −1 to +1 scale, -0.35 describes how much the two returns move together: +1 is lockstep, 0 is independence, negative values mean opposite directions. It says nothing about which performed better.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/fngd-vs-rcus.json

FNGD vs RCUS: 3-year weekly correlation -0.35FNGD vs RCUS-0.35

Drop this badge in a README or notebook; it updates with the data:

[![FNGD vs RCUS correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/fngd-vs-rcus.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/fngd-vs-rcus/)

The core API is free. Terms and every endpoint in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: FNGD correlations · RCUS correlations