FNGD vs PSQH: Correlation
MicroSectors FANG Index -3X Inverse Leveraged ETNs due (FNGD) and PSQ Holdings, Inc. (PSQH) show a negative relationship: their 3-year correlation of weekly returns is -0.36.
Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology
How correlated are FNGD and PSQH?
Over the past 3 years, FNGD and PSQH moved with a correlation of -0.36, which is negative, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. The past 12 months show a weaker link (-0.47) than the 3-year average (-0.36). Over 5 years the correlation is -0.17, and the annualized covariance of weekly returns is -2700.5 %².
By 3-year correlation, PSQH places #1198 of the 1743 assets tracked against FNGD. The last year tells two different stories: FNGD led by 18.8 percentage points, -55.7% for FNGD against -74.5% for PSQH.
How is this computed?
Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.
FNGD vs PSQH: side by side
| FNGD (MicroSectors FANG Index -3X Inverse Leveraged ETNs due) | PSQH (PSQ Holdings, Inc.) | |
|---|---|---|
| 1-year return | -55.7% | -74.5% |
| 5-year return | -99.4% | -95.6% |
| Volatility (ann.) | 75.7% | 99.9% |
| Beta vs S&P 500 | -4.54 | 2.13 |
| Max drawdown (3Y) | -97.6% | -98.4% |
| Market cap | – | – |
| P/E (trailing) | 20.6 | – |
| Dividend yield | 0.00% | 0.00% |
| Sector / category | US Listed | US Listed |
Year-by-year returns
| Year | FNGD | PSQH |
|---|---|---|
| 2022 | +52.2% | +3.1% |
| 2023 | -90.1% | -47.3% |
| 2024 | -76.6% | -13.4% |
| 2025 | -61.4% | -77.3% |
| 2026 | -49.5% | -59.0% |
Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.
Are FNGD and PSQH good diversifiers for each other?
By historical standards, yes. A correlation of -0.36 means the two rarely move for the same reasons.
FAQ
What is the correlation between FNGD and PSQH?
Using weekly returns as of 2026-08-27: -0.36 over 3 years, with -0.47 over the last year and -0.17 over 5 years.
Is PSQH a good diversifier for FNGD?
By historical standards, yes. A correlation of -0.36 means the two rarely move for the same reasons.
What does a correlation of -0.36 mean?
On the −1 to +1 scale, -0.36 describes how much the two returns move together: +1 is lockstep, 0 is independence, negative values mean opposite directions. It says nothing about which performed better.
Use this data
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/fngd-vs-psqh.json
Markdown for the live badge, attribution link included:
[](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/fngd-vs-psqh/)
No key needed, free to use. Full endpoint list in the API documentation.
Related comparisons
Hubs: FNGD correlations · PSQH correlations
