PairBook
HomeFNGD › FNGD vs PK

FNGD vs PK: Correlation

MicroSectors FANG Index -3X Inverse Leveraged ETNs due (FNGD) and Park Hotels & Resorts Inc. (PK) show a negative relationship: their 3-year correlation of weekly returns is -0.22.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
-0.22
negative
Correlation (1Y)
0.13
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
-0.35
long-run
Ann. covariance
-532.8
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are FNGD and PK?

Across a 3-year window, the weekly returns of FNGD and PK correlate at -0.22, negative, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. The link has tightened recently: the 1-year correlation (0.13) runs above the 3-year figure (-0.22). Stretching to 5 years gives -0.35, with an annualized covariance of -532.8 %².

By 3-year correlation, PK places #193 of the 1743 assets tracked against FNGD. The last year tells two different stories: PK led by 99.1 percentage points, -55.7% for FNGD against +43.4% for PK. Note the risk asymmetry: FNGD runs 2.4 times the annualized volatility of the other leg, so equal-weighting the two is not an equal-risk position.

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

FNGD vs PK: side by side

FNGD (MicroSectors FANG Index -3X Inverse Leveraged ETNs due)PK (Park Hotels & Resorts Inc.)
1-year return-55.7%+43.4%
5-year return-99.4%+21.9%
Volatility (ann.)75.7%31.8%
Beta vs S&P 500-4.540.99
Max drawdown (3Y)-97.6%-44.8%
Market cap$3.2B
P/E (trailing)20.6
Dividend yield0.00%6.28%
Sector / categoryUS ListedUS Listed
Higher yield: PK 6.28% vs 0.00%Smaller drawdown: PK -44.8% vs -97.6%Higher 5y return: PK +21.9% vs -99.4%
-52%0%+49%2025-09-052026-08-27
Both assets over the last year, indexed to 100 at the starting week. FNGD · PK

Year-by-year returns

YearFNGDPK
2022+52.2%-36.0%
2023-90.1%+49.4%
2024-76.6%+1.0%
2025-61.4%-18.4%
2026-49.5%+56.5%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are FNGD and PK good diversifiers for each other?

By historical standards, yes. A correlation of -0.22 means the two rarely move for the same reasons.

FAQ

What is the correlation between FNGD and PK?

Using weekly returns as of 2026-08-27: -0.22 over 3 years, with 0.13 over the last year and -0.35 over 5 years.

Is PK a good diversifier for FNGD?

By historical standards, yes. A correlation of -0.22 means the two rarely move for the same reasons.

What does a correlation of -0.22 mean?

A reading of -0.22 sits on a scale from −1 (opposite moves) through 0 (unrelated) to +1 (identical moves). Correlation captures direction, not magnitude or performance.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/fngd-vs-pk.json

FNGD vs PK: 3-year weekly correlation -0.22FNGD vs PK-0.22

Embed this badge (it refreshes with the data), with attribution:

[![FNGD vs PK correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/fngd-vs-pk.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/fngd-vs-pk/)

The core API is free. Terms and every endpoint in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: FNGD correlations · PK correlations