FNGD vs PFLT: Correlation
Measured on weekly returns over the past three years, MicroSectors FANG Index -3X Inverse Leveraged ETNs due (FNGD) and PennantPark Floating Rate Capital Ltd. (PFLT) carry a correlation of -0.33, a negative link.
Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology
How correlated are FNGD and PFLT?
Across a 3-year window, the weekly returns of FNGD and PFLT correlate at -0.33, negative, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. Little has changed lately, as the 1-year reading of -0.40 lands near the 3-year figure. Stretching to 5 years gives -0.32, with an annualized covariance of -508.6 %².
Among the 1743 assets we track against FNGD, PFLT ranks #1049 by 3-year correlation. The last year tells two different stories: PFLT led by 39.7 percentage points, -55.7% for FNGD against -16.0% for PFLT. Note the risk asymmetry: FNGD runs 3.8 times the annualized volatility of the other leg, so equal-weighting the two is not an equal-risk position.
How is this computed?
Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.
FNGD vs PFLT: side by side
| FNGD (MicroSectors FANG Index -3X Inverse Leveraged ETNs due) | PFLT (PennantPark Floating Rate Capital Ltd.) | |
|---|---|---|
| 1-year return | -55.7% | -16.0% |
| 5-year return | -99.4% | +1.5% |
| Volatility (ann.) | 75.7% | 20.1% |
| Beta vs S&P 500 | -4.54 | 0.69 |
| Max drawdown (3Y) | -97.6% | -28.4% |
| Market cap | – | $0.7B |
| P/E (trailing) | 20.6 | 14.6 |
| Dividend yield | 0.00% | 16.43% |
| Sector / category | US Listed | US Listed |
Year-by-year returns
| Year | FNGD | PFLT |
|---|---|---|
| 2022 | +52.2% | -5.5% |
| 2023 | -90.1% | +23.1% |
| 2024 | -76.6% | +0.7% |
| 2025 | -61.4% | -4.1% |
| 2026 | -49.5% | -12.0% |
Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.
Are FNGD and PFLT good diversifiers for each other?
Yes: at -0.33, the two have gone their own ways historically, which is what genuine diversification looks like.
FAQ
What is the correlation between FNGD and PFLT?
Using weekly returns as of 2026-08-27: -0.33 over 3 years, with -0.40 over the last year and -0.32 over 5 years.
Is PFLT a good diversifier for FNGD?
Yes: at -0.33, the two have gone their own ways historically, which is what genuine diversification looks like.
What does a correlation of -0.33 mean?
Correlation ranges from −1 to +1. Values near +1 mean two assets move together, near 0 that they move independently, and negative values that they tend to move in opposite directions. It measures co-movement, not performance.
Use this data
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/fngd-vs-pflt.json
Embed this badge (it refreshes with the data), with attribution:
[](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/fngd-vs-pflt/)
The core API is free. Terms and every endpoint in the API documentation.
Related comparisons
Hubs: FNGD correlations · PFLT correlations
