PairBook
HomeFNGD › FNGD vs PDLB

FNGD vs PDLB: Correlation

How closely do MicroSectors FANG Index -3X Inverse Leveraged ETNs due (FNGD) and Ponce Financial Group, Inc. (PDLB) trade together? Their weekly returns over three years give a correlation of -0.26, which is negative.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
-0.26
negative
Correlation (1Y)
-0.04
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
-0.20
long-run
Ann. covariance
-502.7
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are FNGD and PDLB?

Over the past 3 years, FNGD and PDLB moved with a correlation of -0.26, which is negative, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. Lately the two have moved closer together, with the 1-year correlation at -0.04 versus -0.26 over 3 years. Over 5 years the correlation is -0.20, and the annualized covariance of weekly returns is -502.7 %².

Among the 1743 assets we track against FNGD, PDLB ranks #525 by 3-year correlation. The last year tells two different stories: PDLB led by 92.1 percentage points, -55.7% for FNGD against +36.4% for PDLB. One caveat on sizing: FNGD is 3.0 times as volatile as the other leg, so an equal-dollar split is far from equal-risk.

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

FNGD vs PDLB: side by side

FNGD (MicroSectors FANG Index -3X Inverse Leveraged ETNs due)PDLB (Ponce Financial Group, Inc.)
1-year return-55.7%+36.4%
5-year return-99.4%+106.7%
Volatility (ann.)75.7%25.5%
Beta vs S&P 500-4.540.76
Max drawdown (3Y)-97.6%-21.5%
Market cap$0.5B
P/E (trailing)20.614.2
Dividend yield0.00%0.00%
Sector / categoryUS ListedUS Listed
Lower P/E: PDLB 14.2 vs 20.6Smaller drawdown: PDLB -21.5% vs -97.6%Higher 5y return: PDLB +106.7% vs -99.4%
-52%0%+49%2025-09-052026-08-27
Twelve months of weekly closes, each series rebased to 100. FNGD · PDLB

Year-by-year returns

YearFNGDPDLB
2022+52.2%-10.3%
2023-90.1%+4.7%
2024-76.6%+33.2%
2025-61.4%+25.8%
2026-49.5%+24.2%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are FNGD and PDLB good diversifiers for each other?

Yes: at -0.26, the two have gone their own ways historically, which is what genuine diversification looks like.

FAQ

What is the correlation between FNGD and PDLB?

As of 2026-08-27, the correlation of weekly returns between FNGD and PDLB is -0.26 over 3 years, -0.04 over 1 year and -0.20 over 5 years.

Is PDLB a good diversifier for FNGD?

Yes: at -0.26, the two have gone their own ways historically, which is what genuine diversification looks like.

What does a correlation of -0.26 mean?

On the −1 to +1 scale, -0.26 describes how much the two returns move together: +1 is lockstep, 0 is independence, negative values mean opposite directions. It says nothing about which performed better.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/fngd-vs-pdlb.json

FNGD vs PDLB: 3-year weekly correlation -0.26FNGD vs PDLB-0.26

Embed this badge (it refreshes with the data), with attribution:

[![FNGD vs PDLB correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/fngd-vs-pdlb.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/fngd-vs-pdlb/)

Free with attribution; caching and terms are described in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: FNGD correlations · PDLB correlations