PairBook
HomeFNGD › FNGD vs NU

FNGD vs NU: Correlation

MicroSectors FANG Index -3X Inverse Leveraged ETNs due (FNGD) and Nu Holdings Ltd. Class A (NU) show a negative relationship: their 3-year correlation of weekly returns is -0.42.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
-0.42
negative
Correlation (1Y)
-0.31
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
-0.45
long-run
Ann. covariance
-1261.8
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are FNGD and NU?

Across a 3-year window, the weekly returns of FNGD and NU correlate at -0.42, negative, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. The past 12 months show a tighter link (-0.31) than the 3-year average (-0.42). Stretching to 5 years gives -0.45, with an annualized covariance of -1261.8 %².

Among the 1743 assets we track against FNGD, NU ranks #1423 by 3-year correlation. Their recent paths diverged sharply: over the last 12 months NU outperformed by 57.3 percentage points (-55.7% for FNGD against +1.6% for NU). Risk is not evenly split, since FNGD carries 1.9 times the volatility of the other side.

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

FNGD vs NU: side by side

FNGD (MicroSectors FANG Index -3X Inverse Leveraged ETNs due)NU (Nu Holdings Ltd. Class A)
1-year return-55.7%+1.6%
5-year return-99.4%+44.0%
Volatility (ann.)75.7%39.4%
Beta vs S&P 500-4.541.26
Max drawdown (3Y)-97.6%-39.6%
Market cap$71.9B
P/E (trailing)20.620.7
Dividend yield0.00%0.00%
Sector / categoryUS ListedUS Listed
Lower P/E: FNGD 20.6 vs 20.7Smaller drawdown: NU -39.6% vs -97.6%Higher 5y return: NU +44.0% vs -99.4%
-52%0%+49%2025-09-052026-08-27
Twelve months of weekly closes, each series rebased to 100. FNGD · NU

Year-by-year returns

YearFNGDNU
2022+52.2%-56.6%
2023-90.1%+104.7%
2024-76.6%+24.4%
2025-61.4%+61.6%
2026-49.5%-11.1%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are FNGD and NU good diversifiers for each other?

By historical standards, yes. A correlation of -0.42 means the two rarely move for the same reasons.

FAQ

What is the correlation between FNGD and NU?

The FNGD/NU correlation stands at -0.42 on a 3-year window (1 year: -0.31, 5 years: -0.45), computed from weekly returns as of 2026-08-27.

Is NU a good diversifier for FNGD?

By historical standards, yes. A correlation of -0.42 means the two rarely move for the same reasons.

What does a correlation of -0.42 mean?

Correlation ranges from −1 to +1. Values near +1 mean two assets move together, near 0 that they move independently, and negative values that they tend to move in opposite directions. It measures co-movement, not performance.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/fngd-vs-nu.json

FNGD vs NU: 3-year weekly correlation -0.42FNGD vs NU-0.42

Markdown for the live badge, attribution link included:

[![FNGD vs NU correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/fngd-vs-nu.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/fngd-vs-nu/)

The core API is free. Terms and every endpoint in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: FNGD correlations · NU correlations