PairBook
HomeFNGD › FNGD vs MRAM

FNGD vs MRAM: Correlation

How closely do MicroSectors FANG Index -3X Inverse Leveraged ETNs due (FNGD) and Everspin Technologies, Inc. (MRAM) trade together? Their weekly returns over three years give a correlation of -0.28, which is negative.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
-0.28
negative
Correlation (1Y)
-0.29
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
-0.34
long-run
Ann. covariance
-1460.1
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are FNGD and MRAM?

On 3 years of weekly data the FNGD/MRAM correlation comes out at -0.28, negative, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. The relationship has been stable: the 1-year correlation (-0.29) sits close to the 3-year figure. The 5-year figure is -0.34, and annualized covariance runs at -1460.1 %².

Within FNGD's tracked universe of 1743 assets, MRAM comes in at #709 by 3-year correlation. Correlation aside, the last 12 months split them widely, with MRAM ahead by 228.9 points (-55.7% versus +173.2%).

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

FNGD vs MRAM: side by side

FNGD (MicroSectors FANG Index -3X Inverse Leveraged ETNs due)MRAM (Everspin Technologies, Inc.)
1-year return-55.7%+173.2%
5-year return-99.4%+134.7%
Volatility (ann.)75.7%69.5%
Beta vs S&P 500-4.541.58
Max drawdown (3Y)-97.6%-70.6%
Market cap$0.4B
P/E (trailing)20.6
Dividend yield0.00%0.00%
Sector / categoryUS ListedUS Listed
Smaller drawdown: MRAM -70.6% vs -97.6%Higher 5y return: MRAM +134.7% vs -99.4%
-52%0%+477%2025-09-052026-08-27
Twelve months of weekly closes, each series rebased to 100. FNGD · MRAM

Year-by-year returns

YearFNGDMRAM
2022+52.2%-50.8%
2023-90.1%+62.6%
2024-76.6%-29.3%
2025-61.4%+45.2%
2026-49.5%+88.1%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are FNGD and MRAM good diversifiers for each other?

Yes: at -0.28, the two have gone their own ways historically, which is what genuine diversification looks like.

FAQ

What is the correlation between FNGD and MRAM?

The FNGD/MRAM correlation stands at -0.28 on a 3-year window (1 year: -0.29, 5 years: -0.34), computed from weekly returns as of 2026-08-27.

Is MRAM a good diversifier for FNGD?

Yes: at -0.28, the two have gone their own ways historically, which is what genuine diversification looks like.

What does a correlation of -0.28 mean?

A reading of -0.28 sits on a scale from −1 (opposite moves) through 0 (unrelated) to +1 (identical moves). Correlation captures direction, not magnitude or performance.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/fngd-vs-mram.json

FNGD vs MRAM: 3-year weekly correlation -0.28FNGD vs MRAM-0.28

Embed this badge (it refreshes with the data), with attribution:

[![FNGD vs MRAM correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/fngd-vs-mram.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/fngd-vs-mram/)

The core API is free. Terms and every endpoint in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: FNGD correlations · MRAM correlations