FNGD vs MDXH: Correlation
How closely do MicroSectors FANG Index -3X Inverse Leveraged ETNs due (FNGD) and MDxHealth SA (MDXH) trade together? Their weekly returns over three years give a correlation of -0.29, which is negative.
Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology
How correlated are FNGD and MDXH?
Across a 3-year window, the weekly returns of FNGD and MDXH correlate at -0.29, negative, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. The relationship has been stable: the 1-year correlation (-0.29) sits close to the 3-year figure. Stretching to 5 years gives -0.12, with an annualized covariance of -1887.9 %².
Within FNGD's tracked universe of 1743 assets, MDXH comes in at #782 by 3-year correlation. Correlation aside, the last 12 months split them widely, with FNGD ahead by 24.2 points (-55.7% versus -79.9%).
How is this computed?
Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.
FNGD vs MDXH: side by side
| FNGD (MicroSectors FANG Index -3X Inverse Leveraged ETNs due) | MDXH (MDxHealth SA) | |
|---|---|---|
| 1-year return | -55.7% | -79.9% |
| 5-year return | -99.4% | -94.0% |
| Volatility (ann.) | 75.7% | 86.5% |
| Beta vs S&P 500 | -4.54 | 1.97 |
| Max drawdown (3Y) | -97.6% | -92.0% |
| Market cap | – | $0.1B |
| P/E (trailing) | 20.6 | – |
| Dividend yield | 0.00% | 0.00% |
| Sector / category | US Listed | US Listed |
Year-by-year returns
| Year | FNGD | MDXH |
|---|---|---|
| 2022 | +52.2% | -30.6% |
| 2023 | -90.1% | -40.4% |
| 2024 | -76.6% | -39.8% |
| 2025 | -61.4% | +50.6% |
| 2026 | -49.5% | -79.8% |
Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.
Are FNGD and MDXH good diversifiers for each other?
By historical standards, yes. A correlation of -0.29 means the two rarely move for the same reasons.
FAQ
What is the correlation between FNGD and MDXH?
As of 2026-08-27, the correlation of weekly returns between FNGD and MDXH is -0.29 over 3 years, -0.29 over 1 year and -0.12 over 5 years.
Is MDXH a good diversifier for FNGD?
By historical standards, yes. A correlation of -0.29 means the two rarely move for the same reasons.
What does a correlation of -0.29 mean?
On the −1 to +1 scale, -0.29 describes how much the two returns move together: +1 is lockstep, 0 is independence, negative values mean opposite directions. It says nothing about which performed better.
Use this data
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/fngd-vs-mdxh.json
Drop this badge in a README or notebook; it updates with the data:
[](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/fngd-vs-mdxh/)
Free with attribution; caching and terms are described in the API documentation.
Related comparisons
Hubs: FNGD correlations · MDXH correlations
