FNGD vs MARA: Correlation
How closely do MicroSectors FANG Index -3X Inverse Leveraged ETNs due (FNGD) and MARA Holdings, Inc. (MARA) trade together? Their weekly returns over three years give a correlation of -0.26, which is negative.
Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology
How correlated are FNGD and MARA?
On 3 years of weekly data the FNGD/MARA correlation comes out at -0.26, negative, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. The relationship has been stable: the 1-year correlation (-0.30) sits close to the 3-year figure. The 5-year figure is -0.42, and annualized covariance runs at -1680.5 %².
Among the 1743 assets we track against FNGD, MARA ranks #511 by 3-year correlation. The last year tells two different stories: MARA led by 30.6 percentage points, -55.7% for FNGD against -25.1% for MARA.
How is this computed?
Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.
FNGD vs MARA: side by side
| FNGD (MicroSectors FANG Index -3X Inverse Leveraged ETNs due) | MARA (MARA Holdings, Inc.) | |
|---|---|---|
| 1-year return | -55.7% | -25.1% |
| 5-year return | -99.4% | -70.7% |
| Volatility (ann.) | 75.7% | 83.9% |
| Beta vs S&P 500 | -4.54 | 2.07 |
| Max drawdown (3Y) | -97.6% | -78.3% |
| Market cap | – | $4.6B |
| P/E (trailing) | 20.6 | – |
| Dividend yield | 0.00% | 0.00% |
| Sector / category | US Listed | US Listed |
Year-by-year returns
| Year | FNGD | MARA |
|---|---|---|
| 2022 | +52.2% | -89.6% |
| 2023 | -90.1% | +586.8% |
| 2024 | -76.6% | -28.6% |
| 2025 | -61.4% | -46.5% |
| 2026 | -49.5% | +32.2% |
Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.
Are FNGD and MARA good diversifiers for each other?
By historical standards, yes. A correlation of -0.26 means the two rarely move for the same reasons.
FAQ
What is the correlation between FNGD and MARA?
The FNGD/MARA correlation stands at -0.26 on a 3-year window (1 year: -0.30, 5 years: -0.42), computed from weekly returns as of 2026-08-27.
Is MARA a good diversifier for FNGD?
By historical standards, yes. A correlation of -0.26 means the two rarely move for the same reasons.
What does a correlation of -0.26 mean?
On the −1 to +1 scale, -0.26 describes how much the two returns move together: +1 is lockstep, 0 is independence, negative values mean opposite directions. It says nothing about which performed better.
Use this data
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/fngd-vs-mara.json
Embed this badge (it refreshes with the data), with attribution:
[](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/fngd-vs-mara/)
No key needed, free to use. Full endpoint list in the API documentation.
Related comparisons
Hubs: FNGD correlations · MARA correlations
