FNGD vs LVO: Correlation
MicroSectors FANG Index -3X Inverse Leveraged ETNs due (FNGD) and LiveOne, Inc. (LVO) show a negative relationship: their 3-year correlation of weekly returns is -0.24.
Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology
How correlated are FNGD and LVO?
Over the past 3 years, FNGD and LVO moved with a correlation of -0.24, which is negative, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. Lately the two have moved closer together, with the 1-year correlation at -0.02 versus -0.24 over 3 years. Over 5 years the correlation is -0.24, and the annualized covariance of weekly returns is -1508.2 %².
Among the 1743 assets we track against FNGD, LVO ranks #344 by 3-year correlation. The last year tells two different stories: LVO led by 22.8 percentage points, -55.7% for FNGD against -32.9% for LVO.
How is this computed?
Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.
FNGD vs LVO: side by side
| FNGD (MicroSectors FANG Index -3X Inverse Leveraged ETNs due) | LVO (LiveOne, Inc.) | |
|---|---|---|
| 1-year return | -55.7% | -32.9% |
| 5-year return | -99.4% | -88.2% |
| Volatility (ann.) | 75.7% | 82.2% |
| Beta vs S&P 500 | -4.54 | 1.85 |
| Max drawdown (3Y) | -97.6% | -83.1% |
| Market cap | – | $0.1B |
| P/E (trailing) | 20.6 | – |
| Dividend yield | 0.00% | 0.00% |
| Sector / category | US Listed | US Listed |
Year-by-year returns
| Year | FNGD | LVO |
|---|---|---|
| 2022 | +52.2% | -49.7% |
| 2023 | -90.1% | +115.8% |
| 2024 | -76.6% | +5.8% |
| 2025 | -61.4% | -67.9% |
| 2026 | -49.5% | -16.1% |
Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.
Are FNGD and LVO good diversifiers for each other?
Yes. With a correlation of -0.24, FNGD and LVO have moved largely independently, which makes them a genuinely diversifying pair by historical standards.
FAQ
What is the correlation between FNGD and LVO?
Using weekly returns as of 2026-08-27: -0.24 over 3 years, with -0.02 over the last year and -0.24 over 5 years.
Is LVO a good diversifier for FNGD?
Yes. With a correlation of -0.24, FNGD and LVO have moved largely independently, which makes them a genuinely diversifying pair by historical standards.
What does a correlation of -0.24 mean?
A reading of -0.24 sits on a scale from −1 (opposite moves) through 0 (unrelated) to +1 (identical moves). Correlation captures direction, not magnitude or performance.
Use this data
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/fngd-vs-lvo.json
Drop this badge in a README or notebook; it updates with the data:
[](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/fngd-vs-lvo/)
No key needed, free to use. Full endpoint list in the API documentation.
Related comparisons
Hubs: FNGD correlations · LVO correlations
