PairBook
HomeFNGD › FNGD vs KODK

FNGD vs KODK: Correlation

MicroSectors FANG Index -3X Inverse Leveraged ETNs due (FNGD) and Eastman Kodak Company Common New (KODK) show a negative relationship: their 3-year correlation of weekly returns is -0.22.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
-0.22
negative
Correlation (1Y)
-0.03
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
-0.34
long-run
Ann. covariance
-1126.3
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are FNGD and KODK?

On 3 years of weekly data the FNGD/KODK correlation comes out at -0.22, negative, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. The past 12 months show a tighter link (-0.03) than the 3-year average (-0.22). The 5-year figure is -0.34, and annualized covariance runs at -1126.3 %².

By 3-year correlation, KODK places #176 of the 1743 assets tracked against FNGD. Correlation aside, the last 12 months split them widely, with KODK ahead by 117.3 points (-55.7% versus +61.6%).

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

FNGD vs KODK: side by side

FNGD (MicroSectors FANG Index -3X Inverse Leveraged ETNs due)KODK (Eastman Kodak Company Common New)
1-year return-55.7%+61.6%
5-year return-99.4%+31.0%
Volatility (ann.)75.7%68.0%
Beta vs S&P 500-4.541.59
Max drawdown (3Y)-97.6%-47.2%
Market cap$0.9B
P/E (trailing)20.6
Dividend yield0.00%0.00%
Sector / categoryUS ListedUS Listed
Smaller drawdown: KODK -47.2% vs -97.6%Higher 5y return: KODK +31.0% vs -99.4%
-52%0%+138%2025-09-052026-08-27
Twelve months of weekly closes, each series rebased to 100. FNGD · KODK

Year-by-year returns

YearFNGDKODK
2022+52.2%-34.8%
2023-90.1%+27.9%
2024-76.6%+68.5%
2025-61.4%+28.8%
2026-49.5%+11.9%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are FNGD and KODK good diversifiers for each other?

By historical standards, yes. A correlation of -0.22 means the two rarely move for the same reasons.

FAQ

What is the correlation between FNGD and KODK?

The FNGD/KODK correlation stands at -0.22 on a 3-year window (1 year: -0.03, 5 years: -0.34), computed from weekly returns as of 2026-08-27.

Is KODK a good diversifier for FNGD?

By historical standards, yes. A correlation of -0.22 means the two rarely move for the same reasons.

What does a correlation of -0.22 mean?

A reading of -0.22 sits on a scale from −1 (opposite moves) through 0 (unrelated) to +1 (identical moves). Correlation captures direction, not magnitude or performance.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/fngd-vs-kodk.json

FNGD vs KODK: 3-year weekly correlation -0.22FNGD vs KODK-0.22

Drop this badge in a README or notebook; it updates with the data:

[![FNGD vs KODK correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/fngd-vs-kodk.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/fngd-vs-kodk/)

No key needed, free to use. Full endpoint list in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: FNGD correlations · KODK correlations