FNGD vs KLTR: Correlation
MicroSectors FANG Index -3X Inverse Leveraged ETNs due (FNGD) and Kaltura, Inc. (KLTR) show a negative relationship: their 3-year correlation of weekly returns is -0.39.
Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology
How correlated are FNGD and KLTR?
Over the past 3 years, FNGD and KLTR moved with a correlation of -0.39, which is negative, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. The relationship has been stable: the 1-year correlation (-0.35) sits close to the 3-year figure. Over 5 years the correlation is -0.34, and the annualized covariance of weekly returns is -2039.0 %².
Among the 1743 assets we track against FNGD, KLTR ranks #1316 by 3-year correlation. Their recent paths diverged sharply: over the last 12 months KLTR outperformed by 56.3 percentage points (-55.7% for FNGD against +0.6% for KLTR).
How is this computed?
Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.
FNGD vs KLTR: side by side
| FNGD (MicroSectors FANG Index -3X Inverse Leveraged ETNs due) | KLTR (Kaltura, Inc.) | |
|---|---|---|
| 1-year return | -55.7% | +0.6% |
| 5-year return | -99.4% | -86.7% |
| Volatility (ann.) | 75.7% | 69.9% |
| Beta vs S&P 500 | -4.54 | 1.87 |
| Max drawdown (3Y) | -97.6% | -61.2% |
| Market cap | – | $0.2B |
| P/E (trailing) | 20.6 | – |
| Dividend yield | 0.00% | 0.00% |
| Sector / category | US Listed | US Listed |
Year-by-year returns
| Year | FNGD | KLTR |
|---|---|---|
| 2022 | +52.2% | -49.0% |
| 2023 | -90.1% | +13.4% |
| 2024 | -76.6% | +12.8% |
| 2025 | -61.4% | -25.5% |
| 2026 | -49.5% | -2.4% |
Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.
Are FNGD and KLTR good diversifiers for each other?
By historical standards, yes. A correlation of -0.39 means the two rarely move for the same reasons.
FAQ
What is the correlation between FNGD and KLTR?
Using weekly returns as of 2026-08-27: -0.39 over 3 years, with -0.35 over the last year and -0.34 over 5 years.
Is KLTR a good diversifier for FNGD?
By historical standards, yes. A correlation of -0.39 means the two rarely move for the same reasons.
What does a correlation of -0.39 mean?
On the −1 to +1 scale, -0.39 describes how much the two returns move together: +1 is lockstep, 0 is independence, negative values mean opposite directions. It says nothing about which performed better.
Use this data
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/fngd-vs-kltr.json
Embed this badge (it refreshes with the data), with attribution:
[](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/fngd-vs-kltr/)
The core API is free. Terms and every endpoint in the API documentation.
Related comparisons
Hubs: FNGD correlations · KLTR correlations
