PairBook
HomeFNGD › FNGD vs IPM

FNGD vs IPM: Correlation

Measured on weekly returns over the past three years, MicroSectors FANG Index -3X Inverse Leveraged ETNs due (FNGD) and Intelligent Protection Management Corp. (IPM) carry a correlation of -0.20, a negative link.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
-0.20
negative
Correlation (1Y)
-0.28
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
-0.15
long-run
Ann. covariance
-1037.8
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are FNGD and IPM?

Over the past 3 years, FNGD and IPM moved with a correlation of -0.20, which is negative, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. The relationship has been stable: the 1-year correlation (-0.28) sits close to the 3-year figure. Over 5 years the correlation is -0.15, and the annualized covariance of weekly returns is -1037.8 %².

By 3-year correlation, IPM places #88 of the 1743 assets tracked against FNGD. Their recent paths diverged sharply: over the last 12 months IPM outperformed by 50.1 percentage points (-55.7% for FNGD against -5.6% for IPM).

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

FNGD vs IPM: side by side

FNGD (MicroSectors FANG Index -3X Inverse Leveraged ETNs due)IPM (Intelligent Protection Management Corp.)
1-year return-55.7%-5.6%
5-year return-99.4%-49.5%
Volatility (ann.)75.7%67.6%
Beta vs S&P 500-4.540.96
Max drawdown (3Y)-97.6%-72.7%
Market cap
P/E (trailing)20.6
Dividend yield0.00%0.00%
Sector / categoryUS ListedUS Listed
Smaller drawdown: IPM -72.7% vs -97.6%Higher 5y return: IPM -49.5% vs -99.4%
-52%0%+49%2025-09-052026-08-27
Price paths over the last 12 months, both indexed to 100 at the start (weekly closes). FNGD · IPM

Year-by-year returns

YearFNGDIPM
2022+52.2%-53.5%
2023-90.1%+77.3%
2024-76.6%-15.0%
2025-61.4%-13.6%
2026-49.5%+8.1%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are FNGD and IPM good diversifiers for each other?

Yes. With a correlation of -0.20, FNGD and IPM have moved largely independently, which makes them a genuinely diversifying pair by historical standards.

FAQ

What is the correlation between FNGD and IPM?

The FNGD/IPM correlation stands at -0.20 on a 3-year window (1 year: -0.28, 5 years: -0.15), computed from weekly returns as of 2026-08-27.

Is IPM a good diversifier for FNGD?

Yes. With a correlation of -0.20, FNGD and IPM have moved largely independently, which makes them a genuinely diversifying pair by historical standards.

What does a correlation of -0.20 mean?

A reading of -0.20 sits on a scale from −1 (opposite moves) through 0 (unrelated) to +1 (identical moves). Correlation captures direction, not magnitude or performance.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/fngd-vs-ipm.json

FNGD vs IPM: 3-year weekly correlation -0.20FNGD vs IPM-0.20

Drop this badge in a README or notebook; it updates with the data:

[![FNGD vs IPM correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/fngd-vs-ipm.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/fngd-vs-ipm/)

Free with attribution; caching and terms are described in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: FNGD correlations · IPM correlations