FNGD vs INOD: Correlation
Measured on weekly returns over the past three years, MicroSectors FANG Index -3X Inverse Leveraged ETNs due (FNGD) and Innodata Inc. (INOD) carry a correlation of -0.40, a negative link.
Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology
How correlated are FNGD and INOD?
On 3 years of weekly data the FNGD/INOD correlation comes out at -0.40, negative, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. The relationship has been stable: the 1-year correlation (-0.45) sits close to the 3-year figure. The 5-year figure is -0.40, and annualized covariance runs at -3766.9 %².
Among the 1743 assets we track against FNGD, INOD ranks #1356 by 3-year correlation. The last year tells two different stories: INOD led by 107.3 percentage points, -55.7% for FNGD against +51.6% for INOD. Note the risk asymmetry: INOD runs 1.6 times the annualized volatility of the other leg, so equal-weighting the two is not an equal-risk position.
How is this computed?
Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.
FNGD vs INOD: side by side
| FNGD (MicroSectors FANG Index -3X Inverse Leveraged ETNs due) | INOD (Innodata Inc.) | |
|---|---|---|
| 1-year return | -55.7% | +51.6% |
| 5-year return | -99.4% | +620.6% |
| Volatility (ann.) | 75.7% | 122.9% |
| Beta vs S&P 500 | -4.54 | 3.71 |
| Max drawdown (3Y) | -97.6% | -63.0% |
| Market cap | – | $2.0B |
| P/E (trailing) | 20.6 | 43.2 |
| Dividend yield | 0.00% | 0.00% |
| Sector / category | US Listed | US Listed |
Year-by-year returns
| Year | FNGD | INOD |
|---|---|---|
| 2022 | +52.2% | -49.8% |
| 2023 | -90.1% | +174.1% |
| 2024 | -76.6% | +385.5% |
| 2025 | -61.4% | +28.9% |
| 2026 | -49.5% | +16.3% |
Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.
Are FNGD and INOD good diversifiers for each other?
Yes: at -0.40, the two have gone their own ways historically, which is what genuine diversification looks like.
FAQ
What is the correlation between FNGD and INOD?
Using weekly returns as of 2026-08-27: -0.40 over 3 years, with -0.45 over the last year and -0.40 over 5 years.
Is INOD a good diversifier for FNGD?
Yes: at -0.40, the two have gone their own ways historically, which is what genuine diversification looks like.
What does a correlation of -0.40 mean?
Correlation ranges from −1 to +1. Values near +1 mean two assets move together, near 0 that they move independently, and negative values that they tend to move in opposite directions. It measures co-movement, not performance.
Use this data
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/fngd-vs-inod.json
Markdown for the live badge, attribution link included:
[](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/fngd-vs-inod/)
No key needed, free to use. Full endpoint list in the API documentation.
Related comparisons
Hubs: FNGD correlations · INOD correlations
