FNGD vs HBM: Correlation
Measured on weekly returns over the past three years, MicroSectors FANG Index -3X Inverse Leveraged ETNs due (FNGD) and Hudbay Minerals Inc. (HBM) carry a correlation of -0.41, a negative link.
Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology
How correlated are FNGD and HBM?
Across a 3-year window, the weekly returns of FNGD and HBM correlate at -0.41, negative, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. Recent behaviour matches the longer record: -0.40 over 1 year against -0.41 over 3. Stretching to 5 years gives -0.35, with an annualized covariance of -1655.9 %².
Among the 1743 assets we track against FNGD, HBM ranks #1383 by 3-year correlation. Correlation aside, the last 12 months split them widely, with HBM ahead by 217.8 points (-55.7% versus +162.1%).
How is this computed?
Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.
FNGD vs HBM: side by side
| FNGD (MicroSectors FANG Index -3X Inverse Leveraged ETNs due) | HBM (Hudbay Minerals Inc.) | |
|---|---|---|
| 1-year return | -55.7% | +162.1% |
| 5-year return | -99.4% | +401.3% |
| Volatility (ann.) | 75.7% | 53.7% |
| Beta vs S&P 500 | -4.54 | 1.73 |
| Max drawdown (3Y) | -97.6% | -41.1% |
| Market cap | – | $13.5B |
| P/E (trailing) | 20.6 | 18.4 |
| Dividend yield | 0.00% | 0.07% |
| Sector / category | US Listed | US Listed |
Year-by-year returns
| Year | FNGD | HBM |
|---|---|---|
| 2022 | +52.2% | -29.9% |
| 2023 | -90.1% | +9.2% |
| 2024 | -76.6% | +47.0% |
| 2025 | -61.4% | +145.3% |
| 2026 | -49.5% | +53.0% |
Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.
Are FNGD and HBM good diversifiers for each other?
By historical standards, yes. A correlation of -0.41 means the two rarely move for the same reasons.
FAQ
What is the correlation between FNGD and HBM?
The FNGD/HBM correlation stands at -0.41 on a 3-year window (1 year: -0.40, 5 years: -0.35), computed from weekly returns as of 2026-08-27.
Is HBM a good diversifier for FNGD?
By historical standards, yes. A correlation of -0.41 means the two rarely move for the same reasons.
What does a correlation of -0.41 mean?
A reading of -0.41 sits on a scale from −1 (opposite moves) through 0 (unrelated) to +1 (identical moves). Correlation captures direction, not magnitude or performance.
Use this data
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/fngd-vs-hbm.json
Drop this badge in a README or notebook; it updates with the data:
[](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/fngd-vs-hbm/)
The core API is free. Terms and every endpoint in the API documentation.
Related comparisons
Hubs: FNGD correlations · HBM correlations
