FND vs WSM: Correlation
Floor & Decor Holdings, Inc. (FND) and Williams-Sonoma, Inc. (WSM) show a strong relationship: their 3-year correlation of weekly returns is 0.60.
Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology
How correlated are FND and WSM?
On 3 years of weekly data the FND/WSM correlation comes out at 0.60, strong. The relationship has been stable: the 1-year correlation (0.64) sits close to the 3-year figure. The 5-year figure is 0.63, and annualized covariance runs at 1049.1 %².
Among the 23 assets we track against FND, WSM ranks #6 by 3-year correlation. Correlation aside, the last 12 months split them widely, with WSM ahead by 61.1 points (-35.3% versus +25.8%).
How is this computed?
Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.
FND vs WSM: side by side
| FND (Floor & Decor Holdings, Inc.) | WSM (Williams-Sonoma, Inc.) | |
|---|---|---|
| 1-year return | -35.3% | +25.8% |
| 5-year return | -56.3% | +182.0% |
| Volatility (ann.) | 40.8% | 43.0% |
| Beta vs S&P 500 | 1.32 | 1.33 |
| Max drawdown (3Y) | -67.5% | -36.8% |
| Market cap | $5.7B | $28.1B |
| P/E (trailing) | 25.4 | 24.4 |
| Dividend yield | 0.00% | 0.56% |
| Sector / category | US Listed | Consumer Discretionary |
Year-by-year returns
| Year | FND | WSM |
|---|---|---|
| 2022 | -46.4% | -30.5% |
| 2023 | +60.2% | +80.2% |
| 2024 | -10.6% | +86.6% |
| 2025 | -38.9% | -2.1% |
| 2026 | -12.4% | +34.9% |
Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.
Are FND and WSM good diversifiers for each other?
Somewhat, no more. With 0.60 correlation, most large moves hit both names, and the diversification benefit stays modest.
FAQ
What is the correlation between FND and WSM?
Using weekly returns as of 2026-08-27: 0.60 over 3 years, with 0.64 over the last year and 0.63 over 5 years.
Is WSM a good diversifier for FND?
Somewhat, no more. With 0.60 correlation, most large moves hit both names, and the diversification benefit stays modest.
What does a correlation of 0.60 mean?
A reading of 0.60 sits on a scale from −1 (opposite moves) through 0 (unrelated) to +1 (identical moves). Correlation captures direction, not magnitude or performance.
Use this data
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/fnd-vs-wsm.json
Markdown for the live badge, attribution link included:
[](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/fnd-vs-wsm/)
No key needed, free to use. Full endpoint list in the API documentation.
Related comparisons
Hubs: FND correlations · WSM correlations
