PairBook
HomeFN › FN vs VXZ

FN vs VXZ: Correlation

Fabrinet (FN) and iPath Series B S&P 500 VIX Mid-Term Futures ETN (VXZ) show a negative relationship: their 3-year correlation of weekly returns is -0.33.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
-0.33
negative
Correlation (1Y)
-0.15
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
-0.33
long-run
Ann. covariance
-470.8
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are FN and VXZ?

Over the past 3 years, FN and VXZ moved with a correlation of -0.33, which is negative, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. The past 12 months show a tighter link (-0.15) than the 3-year average (-0.33). Over 5 years the correlation is -0.33, and the annualized covariance of weekly returns is -470.8 %².

Out of 13 assets tracked against FN, VXZ lands near the bottom at #11. The last year tells two different stories: FN led by 46.3 percentage points, +30.2% for FN against -16.1% for VXZ. Note the risk asymmetry: FN runs 2.2 times the annualized volatility of the other leg, so equal-weighting the two is not an equal-risk position.

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

FN vs VXZ: side by side

FN (Fabrinet)VXZ (iPath Series B S&P 500 VIX Mid-Term Futures ETN)
1-year return+30.2%-16.1%
5-year return+317.1%-53.1%
Volatility (ann.)55.4%25.6%
Beta vs S&P 5001.97-1.31
Max drawdown (3Y)-44.5%-36.4%
Market cap$15.5B
P/E (trailing)33.2
Dividend yield0.00%
Sector / categoryUS ListedUS Listed
Smaller drawdown: VXZ -36.4% vs -44.5%Higher 5y return: FN +317.1% vs -53.1%
-16%0%+95%2025-09-052026-08-27
Both assets over the last year, indexed to 100 at the starting week. FN · VXZ

Year-by-year returns

YearFNVXZ
2022+8.2%+0.5%
2023+48.4%-44.0%
2024+15.5%-12.7%
2025+107.1%+5.7%
2026-5.0%-10.5%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are FN and VXZ good diversifiers for each other?

By historical standards, yes. A correlation of -0.33 means the two rarely move for the same reasons.

FAQ

What is the correlation between FN and VXZ?

The FN/VXZ correlation stands at -0.33 on a 3-year window (1 year: -0.15, 5 years: -0.33), computed from weekly returns as of 2026-08-27.

Is VXZ a good diversifier for FN?

By historical standards, yes. A correlation of -0.33 means the two rarely move for the same reasons.

What does a correlation of -0.33 mean?

Correlation ranges from −1 to +1. Values near +1 mean two assets move together, near 0 that they move independently, and negative values that they tend to move in opposite directions. It measures co-movement, not performance.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/fn-vs-vxz.json

FN vs VXZ: 3-year weekly correlation -0.33FN vs VXZ-0.33

Drop this badge in a README or notebook; it updates with the data:

[![FN vs VXZ correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/fn-vs-vxz.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/fn-vs-vxz/)

The core API is free. Terms and every endpoint in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: FN correlations · VXZ correlations