FLUT vs VXZ: Correlation
How closely do Flutter Entertainment plc (FLUT) and iPath Series B S&P 500 VIX Mid-Term Futures ETN (VXZ) trade together? Their weekly returns over three years give a correlation of -0.30, which is negative.
Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology
How correlated are FLUT and VXZ?
Across a 3-year window, the weekly returns of FLUT and VXZ correlate at -0.30, negative, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. Recent behaviour matches the longer record: -0.32 over 1 year against -0.30 over 3. Stretching to 5 years gives -0.36, with an annualized covariance of -323.5 %².
Among the 14 assets we track against FLUT, VXZ sits near the bottom by co-movement, at rank #12. Their recent paths diverged sharply: over the last 12 months VXZ outperformed by 52.8 percentage points (-68.9% for FLUT against -16.1% for VXZ). Risk is not evenly split, since FLUT carries 1.6 times the volatility of the other side.
How is this computed?
Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.
FLUT vs VXZ: side by side
| FLUT (Flutter Entertainment plc) | VXZ (iPath Series B S&P 500 VIX Mid-Term Futures ETN) | |
|---|---|---|
| 1-year return | -68.9% | -16.1% |
| 5-year return | -51.0% | -53.1% |
| Volatility (ann.) | 41.7% | 25.6% |
| Beta vs S&P 500 | 1.16 | -1.31 |
| Max drawdown (3Y) | -70.1% | -36.4% |
| Market cap | $16.5B | – |
| P/E (trailing) | – | – |
| Dividend yield | 0.00% | – |
| Sector / category | US Listed | US Listed |
Year-by-year returns
| Year | FLUT | VXZ |
|---|---|---|
| 2022 | -14.4% | +0.5% |
| 2023 | +32.8% | -44.0% |
| 2024 | +44.4% | -12.7% |
| 2025 | -16.8% | +5.7% |
| 2026 | -55.8% | -10.5% |
Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.
Are FLUT and VXZ good diversifiers for each other?
Yes. With a correlation of -0.30, FLUT and VXZ have moved largely independently, which makes them a genuinely diversifying pair by historical standards.
FAQ
What is the correlation between FLUT and VXZ?
The FLUT/VXZ correlation stands at -0.30 on a 3-year window (1 year: -0.32, 5 years: -0.36), computed from weekly returns as of 2026-08-27.
Is VXZ a good diversifier for FLUT?
Yes. With a correlation of -0.30, FLUT and VXZ have moved largely independently, which makes them a genuinely diversifying pair by historical standards.
What does a correlation of -0.30 mean?
On the −1 to +1 scale, -0.30 describes how much the two returns move together: +1 is lockstep, 0 is independence, negative values mean opposite directions. It says nothing about which performed better.
Use this data
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/flut-vs-vxz.json
Drop this badge in a README or notebook; it updates with the data:
[](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/flut-vs-vxz/)
The core API is free. Terms and every endpoint in the API documentation.
Related comparisons
Hubs: FLUT correlations · VXZ correlations
