PairBook
HomeFLD › FLD vs MLGO

FLD vs MLGO: Correlation

How closely do Fold Holdings, Inc. (FLD) and MicroAlgo, Inc. (MLGO) trade together? Their weekly returns over three years give a correlation of -0.24, which is negative.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
-0.24
negative
Correlation (1Y)
0.32
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
-0.24
long-run
Ann. covariance
-9245.8
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are FLD and MLGO?

Across a 3-year window, the weekly returns of FLD and MLGO correlate at -0.24, negative, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. The past 12 months show a tighter link (0.32) than the 3-year average (-0.24). Stretching to 5 years gives -0.24, with an annualized covariance of -9245.8 %².

Out of 13 assets tracked against FLD, MLGO lands near the bottom at #9. The last year tells two different stories: MLGO led by 30.7 percentage points, -83.6% for FLD against -52.9% for MLGO. One caveat on sizing: MLGO is 6.2 times as volatile as the other leg, so an equal-dollar split is far from equal-risk.

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

FLD vs MLGO: side by side

FLD (Fold Holdings, Inc.)MLGO (MicroAlgo, Inc.)
1-year return-83.6%-52.9%
5-year return-93.7%-100.0%
Volatility (ann.)78.8%489.7%
Beta vs S&P 5000.49-2.77
Max drawdown (3Y)-96.7%-100.0%
Market cap
P/E (trailing)1.9
Dividend yield0.00%0.00%
Sector / categoryUS ListedUS Listed
Smaller drawdown: FLD -96.7% vs -100.0%Higher 5y return: FLD -93.7% vs -100.0%
-88%0%+39%2025-09-052026-08-27
Both assets over the last year, indexed to 100 at the starting week. FLD · MLGO

Year-by-year returns

YearFLDMLGO
2022-87.6%
2023+5.3%-27.0%
2024+5.2%-97.9%
2025-76.5%-96.1%
2026-76.6%-6.3%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are FLD and MLGO good diversifiers for each other?

Yes. With a correlation of -0.24, FLD and MLGO have moved largely independently, which makes them a genuinely diversifying pair by historical standards.

FAQ

What is the correlation between FLD and MLGO?

Using weekly returns as of 2026-08-27: -0.24 over 3 years, with 0.32 over the last year and -0.24 over 5 years.

Is MLGO a good diversifier for FLD?

Yes. With a correlation of -0.24, FLD and MLGO have moved largely independently, which makes them a genuinely diversifying pair by historical standards.

What does a correlation of -0.24 mean?

Correlation ranges from −1 to +1. Values near +1 mean two assets move together, near 0 that they move independently, and negative values that they tend to move in opposite directions. It measures co-movement, not performance.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/fld-vs-mlgo.json

FLD vs MLGO: 3-year weekly correlation -0.24FLD vs MLGO-0.24

Drop this badge in a README or notebook; it updates with the data:

[![FLD vs MLGO correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/fld-vs-mlgo.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/fld-vs-mlgo/)

No key needed, free to use. Full endpoint list in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: FLD correlations · MLGO correlations